18th June - FINAL - India vs Pakistan

[Shri]

I don't think it was that significant. Considering how well they batted, Azam and Hafeez would've done a great job had they come in earlier.

Would have at least been a 50 run advantage to us since others would have been forced to bat defensively.

 

[hendrix]

Jesus christ this Star Sports analysis is nearly as bad as *****'s bowling analysis.

 

[harsh.ag]

I don't think it was that significant. Considering how well they batted, Azam and Hafeez would've done a great job had they come in earlier.

You're off your rocker.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Wow this anaysis is.... embarassingly bad

 

[fredfertang]

There's something not right when Pakistan get that many runs and Sarfraz doesn't even need to bat

 

[cnerd123]

You guys are unbelievable. Out of the 4 wickets that were taken, 1 was through a run out and the other 3 were batsmen slogging their way back into the pavilion. India have no chance, FMD that's total BS

we don't have Pak's pace attack tho

 

[CricAddict]

You guys are unbelievable. Out of the 4 wickets that were taken, 1 was through a run out and the other 3 were batsmen slogging their way back into the pavilion. India have no chance, FMD that's total BS

I agree. I saw the full innings and there is nothing in the pitch for the bowlers. India has a good chance if they do not get rushed and slog.

 

[OverratedSanity]

You're off your rocker.

I thought Azam batted better than Fakhar even though his innings wasn't as significant. No reason to think he wouldn't have done a good job sooner.

It's pointless anyway. The no-ball happened and India have no one to blame but themselves.

 

[harsh.ag]

Your ifs and buts sicken me. If it wasn't a no ball, he probably wouldn't have been out on it as that extra milli second makes a difference at times. Last time you were saying Bangladesh should have scored less. At least this time India have no one to blame except themselves.

Well done.

 

[vcs]

Jesus christ this Star Sports analysis is nearly as bad as *****'s bowling analysis.

Coverage of cricket on Indian TV is absolutely comical these days. It's beyond a joke. Makes me sad how shallow and stupid they think Indian audiences are, trying to appeal to them with **** like fake moustaches and banging on drums.

 

[Pratters]

Well done.

They do because no logic. If not no ball. Have you considered if it was not a no ball he would have probably not been out on it as a small footing advantage can make that milli second of a difference.. dire.

 

[Shri]

we don't have Pak's pace attack tho

The faster they come, the harder they disappear. Bring it on.

 

[AndyZaltzHair]

Rohit or Kohli has to make big hundred. If both fail, India has no chance

 

[vcs]

The faster they come, the harder they disappear. Bring it on.

They've dropped Wahab

 

[OverratedSanity]

You guys are unbelievable. Out of the 4 wickets that were taken, 1 was through a run out and the other 3 were batsmen slogging their way back into the pavilion. India have no chance, FMD that's total BS

Lol you're the guy who said this:

India are going to stroll this.

Which is a far more ridiculous statement.

 

[Teja.]

someone please check chances of rain. some dude was saying itt there's a good chance.

srini please pay mayanti 700k usd for rain dance hawan.

 

[Contra]

India have to keep reminding themselves of the kind of chases they have chased in years past. Just a few months ago they gunned down 363 against England after being 63/4. Obviously it's not gonna be easy and Pakistan are huge favourites but India have to believe. They need to just bat and see how Pakistan react under pressure.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Hope we don't lose wickets soon. Shouldn't panic trying to score too quickly. See out Junaid and Hasan and target Imad and co.

 

[harsh.ag]

They do because no logic. If not no ball. Have you considered if it was not a no ball he would have probably not been out on it as a small footing advantage can make that milli second of a difference.. dire.

Have considered it. Think the probability is low of the result changing. You think the probability is high of result changing. That's just a difference of opinion. Dire.

 

[AndyZaltzHair]

Beauty