That was a cracking piece of bowling. Classic spinners dismissal.Is a stumping off a wide a more or less quintessential Rashid wicket than a long-hop being smashed straight to mid-on?
I see now. Thanks.Their NRR is totally irrelevant actually. The only way they can finish level with anyone is if Australia tie or have the game rained off and NZ beat Bangladesh. In that scenario NZ finish ahead of Australia by virtue of winning one game more (NRR is the second tiebreaker after most wins).
Santner can't bat. Every now and then he offers a lucky cameo but he's scared of the short ball, is limited in the shots he can play and really at int level should be a #9 ODI bat (and not play tests)Yea NZ have a hell of a drop off from the Kane/Taylor/Guptill to the rest. Would have thought Santner would be more suited up the order to extend the innings a bit and keep the big 3 company during the first 35-40 overs. Because as shown he's hopeless having a slog.
What if England beat Australia and NZ-Bang gets rained off? Wouldnt it come down to NRR then.Their NRR is totally irrelevant actually. The only way they can finish level with anyone is if Australia tie or have the game rained off and NZ beat Bangladesh. In that scenario NZ finish ahead of Australia by virtue of winning one game more (NRR is the second tiebreaker after most wins).
Oh yeah, just watched the clip on cricinfo - I had harshly assumed it was a bad ball played poorly. Nice take from Buttler.That was a cracking piece of bowling. Classic spinners dismissal.
Yea, but none of your other specialist bats (besides the main 3) can bat either. So you may as well try and make the most of what you have, Santner was absolutely hopeless trying to score quickly. As long as he can score at 70-80 SR at 5 then you're making more of the available batting resources. NZ have plenty of guys who can have a slog at 8, Munro or whoever can come in for Broom.Santner can't bat. Every now and then he offers a lucky cameo but he's scared of the short ball, is limited in the shots he can play and really at int level should be a #9 ODI bat (and not play tests)
Ah yes, fair point. Although NZ were never going to catch Bangladesh's NRR anyway.What if England beat Australia and NZ-Bang gets rained off? Wouldnt it come down to NRR then.
This is all true but Santner flat out can't bat. It wouldn't work. As you say he can't score quick enough.Yea, but none of your other specialist bats (besides the main 3) can bat either. So you may as well try and make the most of what you have, Santner was absolutely hopeless trying to score quickly. As long as he can score at 70-80 SR at 5 then you're making more of the available batting resources. NZ have plenty of guys who can have a slog at 8, Munro or whoever can come in for Broom.