sledger
Spanish_Vicente
No.Did that ever really happen though?
No.Did that ever really happen though?
Did that ever really happen though?
Yeah Naito is easily my favourite from Japan, such a bad ass.Naito pulling in those 5 star matches from Big Daddy Meltzer.
I can't remember if I posted anything about the match with Elgin, but it's very good if anyone missed it.
Well before my time. I got WCW at midnight that I watched infrequently in 1997 because I was 8 and it was midnight. I switched to WWF with Jericho.Remember random tag matches with Shawn Michaels, Diesel and Undertaker against Yokozuna, Bull Dog and Owen and commentators always used to hype up how the Camp Cornette were favorites as they were used to working as a team. Same with Smoking Guns Vs Ahmed Johnson and HBK... Or when Razor Ramon and 1 2 K Kid faced Ted Dibiase's guys.. Or LOD taking on Shawn and Austin. There were many instances like that in the New Gen era.
Lmao yeah, the F's booking in those days was so logical.Remember random tag matches with Shawn Michaels, Diesel and Undertaker against Yokozuna, Bull Dog and Owen and commentators always used to hype up how the Camp Cornette were favorites as they were used to working as a team. Same with Smoking Guns Vs Ahmed Johnson and HBK... Or when Razor Ramon and 1 2 K Kid faced Ted Dibiase's guys.. Or LOD taking on Shawn and Austin.
Fair enough, your experiences are your own etc. But to imply that there haven't been any good stories in WWE programming over the last few years is just plainly not true imo.I think that is where we differ. I like the "Entertainment" of wrestling a lot more than actual mat wrestling, or the way folks tell a "story" through their match. I mean, dont get me wrong, I can appreciate good wrestling but to me, there are no great matches without great stories preceding whatever story they tell during the actual match itself. And I am just here to mention my opinion. I do not follow the E as much as I used to and I am just bummed coz I see some guys with real potential to entertain and they are being wasted coz the booking is more often than not, predictable. Maybe if we had the net and all these Meltzers, I would have felt the same way about wrestling in the 90s. Or maybe it just a natural way of how you look at it as a teenager compared to an almost middle aged person. But whatever the reason be, I just dont think WWE are doing as much as they can with the talent they have right now and most of it comes down to rather predictable "shove em down our throat" booking and I dont think that existed that much back in the 90s Again, it is one thing when you are competing to get the fans' attention and time, quite another when you know you basically have their money in your pocket as there is no real product at that scale around apart from WWE themselves.
Not true the reality era was worse than now or ruthless aggression.Every era had as much wrestlecrap as any other tbh. People just think that 'their' generation of wrestling is the best.
While this is true I think it's more egregious today because of how so many people have vehemently rejected Reigns and yet, they keep shoving him down everyone's throats.And the shove it down the throat booking has always been a thing. You may not have noticed it in the 90s, or it may have been more subtle, but it was unquestionably there, and it always has been.
Currently it's the new era. Urgh.What is this era called?
Na it's different, people boo Reigns but they keep watching and buying tickets. He's a draw, Luger wasn't.While this is true I think it's more egregious today because of how so many people have vehemently rejected Reigns and yet, they keep shoving him down everyone's throats.
Previously, if their golden boy (eg:Luger) was rejected by the audience, they wouldn't persist with it quite this much.