***Official*** Pakistan in Australia 2016/17

[Alex0paul]

How is that conclusive evidence?

 

[Johnners]

Nah that wasn't out

 

[stephen]

Pretty much the same as yesterday and iI don't think either should be given.

 

[vcs]

Huh?

 

[Spark]

That's... highly questionable

 

[Tangles]

Yeah dodgy as ****. You could hear the doubt in his voice and he still overturns it.

 

[Gnske]

So is the umpiring ethos now that if there's even the most remote signal of an edge, even if its utterly inconclusive and regardless of the original decision that it must be out when all the other signals indicate otherwise?

 

[Nate]

O'Keefe better average than Lyon STOP ALL CRICKEt FOREVER WE'VE PEAKED

 

[quincywagstaff]

Thank goodness that decision wasn't pivotal for the match; didn't think Snicko was even convincing.

 

[Spark]

Yeah I'm not even that convinced he's even hit it, let alone that being "conclusive evidence"

 

[dfrinku]

They should change the name from Real-Time Snicko to Somewhere Close Enough Snicko

 

[quincywagstaff]

Maybe Ian Gould decided to give that just to piss off Warne.

 

[vcs]

Stupid decision. I don't know the science behind Snicko, but does it give a flicker if the ball passes very close to the bat?

 

[Spark]

Stupid decision. I don't know the science behind Snicko, but does it give a flicker if the ball passes very close to the bat?

Never heard of this, how would it work?

 

[TheJediBrah]

Who's that girl? decent fielding effort

 

[vcs]

I don't know. You're the physicist.

 

[Spark]

With Chappell here tbh. This is always tedious as hell

 

[Starfighter]

Riaz's dismissal about as out as Smith was yesterday.

 

[dfrinku]

Riaz's dismissal about as out as Smith was yesterday.

So you're calling Wahab a cheat!?

 

[irfan]

Stupid decision. I don't know the science behind Snicko, but does it give a flicker if the ball passes very close to the bat?

Agreed. Horrid decision, clearly bat on ground after the ball passed the bat. What happened to the benefit of the doubt?