FWIW, I think Kane is tracking to have a better overall career than Amla:And OS, I dont think of KW and Amla as very similar players at all. Maybe you mean their roles are similar for their sides. I am reading this half asleep anyways, but to me, they are very different players and I feel KW is better.
Not surprised at either of those... in fact it would have been surprising if it were the other way around, especially Chappell vs. Pollock. Pollock to many (especially of that vintage) was the greatest left-handed batsman ever to play the game. These sort of comments by former players don't go unnoticed.Very surprised Weekes beat out Border in votes, and mildly surprised Pollock was beaten by Chappell.
One of the amazing things about Kallis is that he only got 2 doubles in his career but still managed a 55+ average. Model of consistency.People need to watch that Kallis documentary (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gI-6PntDE0to) understand the way he played and to realise he'd likely have been far more dashing had he been in the Australian set-up for example
Yes. We're voting on the Greatest Batsman of all-time, not the greatest cricketerWait are we only considering batting? Because otherwise Kallis's bowling puts him on top of all the others