Zinzan
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, that wasn't a yorker though was it?Leave for 15 min and we take a wicket... but what a ball. Rabada has great yorkers, does that alot, and with his speed... sigh
Yeah, that wasn't a yorker though was it?Leave for 15 min and we take a wicket... but what a ball. Rabada has great yorkers, does that alot, and with his speed... sigh
Full ball....then after threatening bowling the bouncer.Yeah, that wasn't a yorker though was it?
I thought it had pitched outside leg live. I don't think bat was an issue.The benefits of pure pace got that wicket. The previous 150km short-ball kept Nicholls on the crease. Dead, shocking decision, didn't look anywhere near bat watching live.
Disappointing finish, but Nicholls was impressive.
Always? You sure? If they'd already used one review, you think they'd waste one on Nichols on a "did >50% of the ball pitch on leg" or "did <50% of the ball pitch outside" rather than save a review for Kane or BJ?Neither were as dead as that though. You'd always review that regardless if you'd wasted one the previous delivery.
Good point. More than one way to win a game with a 4-seamer attack. Don't always need to bowl first.jesus up-and-down bounce is going to make it impossible to play Rabada if we can get to the 4th innings.
We hit him out of the attack.I would have preferred Piedt coming on now, don`t just want him to bowl the over before lunch....yes I am aware he has already bowled 2 but he needs a decent spell.
I just thought that looked 99.99% dead and looked nowhere near the bat watching live. So if you've ever going to review an LBW, it was that one. Especially since height wasn't a factor.Always? You sure? If they'd already used one review, you think they'd waste one on Nichols on a "did >50% of the ball pitch on leg" or "did <50% of the ball pitch outside" rather than save a review for Kane or BJ?
And yes, I understand that a ***y appeal has more chance of getting a review.