I think it was pretty good money for a relatively unproven teenager back then. Obviously they turned out to be great investments in the long run (Rooney, Ronaldo, van Nistelrooy), but they were significant outlays for the time I think.The Ronaldo signing can hardly be considered an example of overspending. Nor can the Nistelrooy one, come to think of it.
Dunno, don't really recall anyone balking at the fee at the time it happened, and it's not like other clubs weren't spending similar amounts on similar-level prospects around the same time (e.g. it was around then that Arsenal signed Reyes for more or less the same figure).I think it was pretty good money for a relatively unproven teenager back then. Obviously they turned out to be great investments in the long run (Rooney, Ronaldo, van Nistelrooy), but they were significant outlays for the time I think.
Should invite the top clubs from the conference in their place, as we finished 6th last season we would scrape in, then I get to boycott games against b teamsArsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United, Manchester City, Tottenham Hotspur and Newcastle won't be entering the Johnstone's Paint Trophy (or whatever it is now). That gives the Chelsea Academy a clear run to the final so that their players get even more exposure and will raise the number of players they have out on loan to 75.
Oh it totally is but I don't think it would be too far away if there was a way of precisely working out transfer market inflation.Even with all that taken into account, it still seems rather just like picking a number out of thin air.
Yeah Ronaldo went to United at a time where a £12m price tag started to move more towards the middle of the market. Obviously it was still loads for an 18 year old though.Dunno, don't really recall anyone balking at the fee at the time it happened, and it's not like other clubs weren't spending similar amounts on similar-level prospects around the same time (e.g. it was around then that Arsenal signed Reyes for more or less the same figure).
When you think back they wasted a ridiculous amount of money on punts on unheard of players after they got it right with Ronaldo. Bebe obviously being the most famous flop they got but it is difficult to say they got value for money on any of foreign youngsters they got in for a few years after. Probably missed a really obvious one out which will come back to haunt me now.The Ronaldo figure did raise huge questions IIRC, as that sort of money on an unheard of kid from Portugal of all places (AKA Figo +10 in most peoples eyes at the time) was really a big gamble.
A few years later we spunked £17m on Nani and £20m on Anderson and no-one cared
An auction / draft one?Why not do an actual fantasy league instead of the bullshit ones where everyone has 95% of the same team?