It's amazing how absolutely serious an offense drugs cheating becomes in the eyes of some when it comes to athletes in the Olympics, but not in cricket.drugs cheating is ****ing despicable and harms the integrity of the sport just as much if not more than spot fixing (not match fixing).
You could maybe argue that Olympic sports focus primarily on pure athletic ability (ie) how fast you can run, how high you can jump etc. far more than cricket does,and thus PEDs benefit Olympic athletes and even athletes in fields like boxing and mma in a way that gives them a direct advantage over someone not taking drugs.It's amazing how absolutely serious an offense drugs cheating becomes in the eyes of some when it comes to athletes in the Olympics, but not in cricket.
For me it spoiled the matches that the trio were previously a part of, rather than anything they would possibly be involved in in the future.Should have always be banned for life in my eyes.
He directly undermined the integrity of the game. Every future match he is involved in could be potentially questionable.
I dunno. I'd say quicker recovery from injuries is definitely an unfair direct advantage. Besides, the ability to propel a ball across 22 yards for prolonged periods is an athletic activity too.You could maybe argue that Olympic sports focus primarily on pure athletic ability (ie) how fast you can run, how high you can jump etc. far more than cricket does,and thus PEDs benefit Olympic athletes and even athletes in fields like boxing and mma in a way that gives them a direct advantage over someone not taking drugs.
It's obviously an unfair advantage in cricket too and it's obviously ****** as hell but one can see why people get more angry about it in athletic competitions.
Sure it is. But there are lots of aspects of cricket where drugs won't help. A 100 M sprint on the other hand is pure and simple. Run faster than the other blokes and you win gold. PEDs can influence thus far far more than in a sport like cricket.I dunno. I'd say quicker recovery from injuries is definitely an unfair direct advantage. Besides, the ability to propel a ball across 22 yards for prolonged periods is an athletic activity too.
Well, people who subscribe to that theory are plain stupid. "Let's consider in lesser light a drugs offence by a cricketer who does benefit from it because there are other aspects of cricket where it doesn't help." Seriously, what a stupid argument that is.Sure it is. But there are lots of aspects of cricket where drugs won't help. A 100 M sprint on the other hand is pure and simple. Run faster than the other blokes and you win gold. PEDs can influence thus far far more than in a sport like cricket.
Kind of a pointless discussion tbh. Let's just agree drugs're bad mkay
Why would people be less angry about it unless they considered it a lesser offence? Emotions like anger don't arise out of thin air. The anger is a response from people's reading of the severity of a situation, which in this case happens to be an irrational reading of the situation.I didn't say it's a lesser offense, moron, I said that's the reason why people are less angry about it.
"my team won because the other person didn't try"Should have always be banned for life in my eyes.
He directly undermined the integrity of the game. Every future match he is involved in could be potentially questionable.
While I'm obviously biased as I was a huge Warne fan, (pre alien take over in 2007)but at least Warne got caught attempting to play to the best of his abilities. There was never any further lingering doubt as to whether he was playing to the best of his ability. For me at least, there is a huge difference between Warne and Amir.
Anyway, I've argued this many times in other threads so flame on
I just wanted to call you a moronWhy would people be less angry about it unless they considered it a lesser offence? Emotions like anger don't arise out of thin air. The anger is a response from people's reading of the severity of a situation, which in this case happens to be an irrational reading of the situation.
That's just rude. You mustn't cut in. You pick a number and get in line behind all the other people awaiting their turn.I just wanted to call you a moron