It was plainly a jokeFTR I also think bringing Swann's association with a gambling company up is kind of irrelevant
Yeah, hard to disagree with Swann really. There should be zero tolerance for match fixing.
Given the bloke has spent three months inside he's not going to be intimidated by a section of the English crowd heckling him - all that will achieve is to rile him up and make him bowl even better, and he's going to be one hell of a handful anywayI fully agree with Swann that Amir shouldn't be playing and I hope he is booed at every ground but the fact is he is playing because the authorities lack the bollocks to do the right thing by the game so we have to get on with it. I will moan till Thursday at 11 but once the game starts we have to get on with the fact the match will have started and what is done is done.
It starts Thursday ftr.can't wait for the series to start. Carn Wednesday
they're banning it in australia tbhNot against gambling per se, but 'instant online' gambling that involves every aspect of a cricket match straight to the individuals smart phone has to be bad.
****ing nanny state we live in FFS.they're banning it in australia tbh
Live online sports betting loophole to be closed by Federal Government - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Oh no, my hearts bleeds for 'William Hill PPL'.they're banning it in australia tbh
Live online sports betting loophole to be closed by Federal Government - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
well that's the point of the legislation strictly speaking****ing nanny state we live in FFS.
I've just started having a bit of a punt on the cricket, very amateur stuff but it's a bit of fun. I don't place any bets at all before a game starts and wait to see odds that look attractive during the course of the game. For instance England are currently paying 1.83 to win the first test........whats the point in having a crack at that?? 1st morning and they're 20/2 and then you'd expect to see some better value.
I don't think I'd bother with it if I can't bet live in play tbh.
Yeah this is probably the case. Swann has talked about this before and framed the issue as what they all felt like in 2010. KP said the said the same thing to George Dobell recently. It's probably the only thing they all agree on.Swann doesn't give a toss about that I would imagine. I imagine all the English players that were playing in that test would have been happy if all 3 were banned for life. It didn't just tarnish the reputation of Pakistan cricket but that of cricket in general and by association English cricket and it's players. It gave cricket an image as a corrupt sport.
It would be personal for the English players involved - so obviously a good reason why they didn't have any input on the punishments of the players.