I definitely have Slovakia and Wales as favourites. Russia almost literally don't have an attack and all of their players are hilariously immobile. They're not even particularly well organised in defence. Couple of supposedly decent players to come back though, so maybe that'll help.Probably yeah, I know what Furball is saying about the last 10 minutes but they never looked like scoring. Having said that I would not say with confidence that Slovakia or Wales will beat them.
With four third places going through, a good performance is probably worth more than a scrappy 1-0 in some ways.I definitely have Slovakia and Wales as favourites. Russia almost literally don't have an attack and all of their players are hilariously immobile. They're not even particularly well organised in defence. Couple of supposedly decent players to come back though, so maybe that'll help.
From England's perspective I'm a bit surprised at how positive the reaction is, I reckon when you take the opposition into account they played better in all of their warm ups. Miles ahead of anything they showed in 2014 though so maybe that's the bar people are using.
The list of accomplished managers who both trust and rate him is probably in double figures. Honestly think you know better?I want to explode the myth that Milner is a good solid option to bring on to help sure things up. No he's just ****ing shite.
About a minute before Russia's goal he allowed a player on the right to bring a long ball down, then run down the wing and get a dangerous volleyed cross in. He did the same useless shepherding role for the cross for the goal, just ran along, put the player under no pressure and allowed the cross.
The guy is complete ****ing shite.
Any decision to play him is therefore ****ing shite. Doesn't matter how many minutes he plays. Anything greater than zero is a **** up.
At full strength he was a sub at best for Man City. At Liverpool he's an ordinary player in an ordinary team.The list of accomplished managers who both trust and rate him is probably in double figures. Honestly think you know better?
Sub at best (which ignores his versatility) in two premier league winning teamsAt full strength he was a sub at best for Man City. At Liverpool he's an ordinary player in an ordinary team.
By England standards he is absolute shite. His technical inability is magnified at this level. His headless chickenry can compensate more at high tempo club level.Sub at best (which ignores his versatility) in two premier league winning teams
Not exactly the same as absolute shite is it
How many England managers have picked him?
Milner is what he is and id never call him a great. But in recent times he's been trusted by some managers with fair pedigree. Counts for something
No issue with the Wilshere sub other than the timing.Truth is, I don't think the substitutions were bad, Sterling was awful, and Milner offered a defensive winger option with the experience and maturity to see a game out. Wilshire was a fair swap for Rooney, someone who can drop deep in midfield if needed, and run and harass the Russians as required. I'd have swapped a poor Kane out for Vardy to run the Russian defence, but apart from that, I didn't disagree with any of the changes when they were made. The issue was the defence losing focus at the end. Cahill and Smalling should have been using the Russian corner as the time to gee up those around them, remind them to keep focused for the last 2 minutes. Likewise they should have known the ball would be coming back in high to them, and to let Rose get caught in a big v small battle was lazy. The goal was England failing to do basic defending late on, and not really down to Hodgson IMO.
I think it's probably past time people put a lid on rating England due to performances in warm ups and qualifyingFrom England's perspective I'm a bit surprised at how positive the reaction is, I reckon when you take the opposition into account they played better in all of their warm ups. Miles ahead of anything they showed in 2014 though so maybe that's the bar people are using.
tbf he has a point about not tracking the Russian who crossed the ball for their equaliser. Just dire from someone who had only been on the pitch for 10 minutes. If nothing else, he should have had the legs to close him down properly.Hold the phone, Scaly doesn't rate Milner? First I've heard of it.
Doesn't matter that much if we win the group, think because of the ridiculous nature of so many going through, we won't get a first-placer in another group if we finish 1st and 2nd.Winning the group is important though, beat Wales and they should manage that.
I think the reaction is understandable when you compare it to England's standard opening game performance, second half was not nearly as good but there was proper football going on.