This is inspired by Jonathan Agnew's recent Twitter post where he asked English fans whether they would support Australia or India in a match containing the two. My rough counting saw the English responders at 5-5, which made me think, what do non-Indian fans think about India?
Specifically,
- What do you think about India's cricket pedigree?
- Do you dislike the 'bullying' done by BCCI?
- Do you think it is justified for India to have such a sway over world cricket?
- Do you think India's importance in the cricket world will keep increasing?
- What teams would you support vs India (apart from your own)? What teams would you support India against?
- Finally, do you ever expect India's obsession with cricket to drift?
Obviously, specify which country you support and try and estimate how nationalistic you are when you watch the sport.
Hi longranger.
This is a great thread. I'll tell you exactly what I think, since you've asked. FTR, I am from Australia and support Australia reasonably passionately but can happily admit when they're outplayed.
Cricketing Pedigree: Appalling, second rate and ultimately a joke away from home. Always have been, always will be. It's a pedigree built upon the whinging of the likes of Gavaskar and Kumble and which evolved into the match fixing culture of the likes of Azhar, the selective deafness of Tendulkar and the illegal bookies who are the cold, black heart of match fixing in world cricket.
BCCI bullying: Meh. They're part of the pedigree. It's to be expected.
Sway over world cricket: The most disturbing part of the so called "sway" India has over world cricket is that it's led to thousands of numpties on here rating players on whether or not they've succeeded on the subcontinent in general and India in particular, when subcontinental teams and players do so poorly everywhere else. For some reason that doesn't seem to matter. Anyway, it is what it is. I won't rate India and Pakistan until they win a test series here, and I won't rate Sri Lanka until they perform a miracle and actually win one test here (shouldn't be that big an ask over 30 years or so, but apparently it is). I haven't considered Bangladesh, because I cbf as they're no good anywhere.
Importance: The importance is purely financial, so yeah it may well be the case. As for influence on the way the game is played, probably not. They haven't influenced the way cricket is played yet, so I can't see it happening in the foreseeable future.
Other teams: I'd support any other team against India, even England. That wasn't have been the case until the Sydney 08 Test, but the way Kumble, Tendulkar and Harbhajan in particular carried on was diabolical and neatly encapsulated the whole "woe is us" attitude which India has forever had on the road and which sums up why they're so **** away from home. Having said that, I would want Dravid to make a ton all the time. Love that bloke.
Obsession: I don't expect India's obsession with cricket to drift, and I hope it doesn't. It's a great game and it's good to have so populous a nation collectively love it, even if the effect of that love has been widespread corruption, match-fixing and an inability to deal with short pitched bowling together with over reliance on the effeminate art of spin bowling.
Aside from all that, I think India has made a massive contribution to cricket, and if I ever have to choose between watching a game in South Sudan or one in Kolkata, I'd have to think really hard about it before choosing the former.