WW already picked a 40-45 player, so I'll jump ahead as I'm after him and it won't affect his next pick. Is that OK?
Few players I could go here. But I'll go Kumar Ranjitsinhji. One of the old time greats, in the modern era it is perfectly feasible to see him averaging in a higher bracket if he had played in the modern era.
1. Matthew Elliott / 30-35
2. Jimmy Cook / 15-20
3. Kumar Ranjitsinhji / 40-45
4. Sachin Tendulkar / 50+
5. Inzamam-ul-Haq* / 45-50
6. Keith Miller (3) / 35-40
7. Ian Healy+ / 25-30
8. Ryan Harris (1) / 20-25
9. Muttiah Muralitharan (5) / 10-15
10. Mohammad Asif (2) / 5-10
11. Chris Martin (4) / 0-5
Pretty happy with that side.
Elliott and Cook is a patchy opening pairing, but in an alternate universe they both could've been very good players. In the 90's from what I heard Elliott had more going for him than Matthew Hayden, but he was exposed a couple of times and never got a real chance after about 2000. With better luck he could've averaged 50. Cook only played Tests when he was nearing 40 due to the Apartheid ban, but his FC average was better than most of his contemporaries. In the Rebel Tests he averaged 43 (against weaker oppostions admittedly) which only Pollock and McEwen bettered. I reckon had South Africa not been awful racists he would be remembered as a gun.
At 3 is the old Prince Ranji. One of the most innovative batsmen of all time, he would give the side much needed class. His FC average (in a time where FC cricket was vastly more important than what it is now) is 56, and his Test average is superior to basically all of his contemporaries.
If the 3 is the Prince of India, then 4 is the God of India. What can I say about Sachin that hasn't already been said? He is probably the biggest icon the game has ever seen.
5 comes Inzamam. One of the more under-rated bats of all-time, his record in victories is immense, a sign that his runs meant something.
Miller comes in as 6 as the all-rounder. In some people eyes he was the greatest all-rounder of all time. I'm not sure if I'd agree, but regardless he was a star and was probably the most 'balanced' all-rounder of all-time.
Healy is the wicket-keeper. He may be a knob, but regardless as a cricketer he was very, very good. Who knows how well he would've been remembered if it wasn't for Gilchrist?
Opening the bowling is Harris and Asif. For various reasons they didn't play an awful lot, but when they did....they were excellent. Harris is cricket's answer to the underdog story...Asif unfortunately has a case of being the biggest disappointment from a country which knows disappointment.
At 2nd change is Chris Martin. We'll all remember for his "batting", but with the ball he was a fine cricketer. In a bowling attack which better resembled a hospital ward he was the one constant despite being somewhat lacking in talent compared to his contemporaries.
For the spinner is Muttiah Muralitharan. Whether his action is legit is something I won't go into, but regardless he was arguably the biggest freak the game produced, one of the greatest spinners of all-time, and the greatest cricketer that Sri Lanka produced.