no they wont for ****s sake. Lyon's record in test cricket is perfectly fine considering that he does most of the bowling in Australia where Murali averages 1000 with the ball. Australia have quick bowlers who are better individual bowlers than Lyon but picking them ahead of Lyon does not make the attack better.To be fair I think it's highly debatable whether Australia's best Test XI includes Nathan Lyon, or a spinner at all.
As popular as Lyon is, he's been average at best. And while it's better to have stuck with him for a while than it was in the immediate post-Warne era of picking a different spinner each game, The selectors need to be wary of going to far in the other direction and continually selecting an average off-spin bowler if you've got better fast bowlers that aren't playing.
Voges and Clarke could probably do almost as good a job as bowlers than Lyon anyway tbh
Ffs we need to stop overestimating himLook, we're not the west Indies who can field 4 atg quicks. At best siddle will only provide the holding role that Lyon does now without the ability to test batsmen with the older ball.
Ffs can we stop underestimating Lyon?
wrongno they wont for ****s sake.
Highly debatable. Dependent on conditions, of course.Lyon's record in test cricket is perfectly fine considering that he does most of the bowling in Australia where Murali averages 1000 with the ball. Australia have quick bowlers who are better individual bowlers than Lyon but picking them ahead of Lyon does not make the attack better.
Probably the last time he ****ed up his back.Also when's the last time Clarke bowled more than 5 overs?
Based on absolute ****Ffs we need to stop overestimating him
wrong
Voges + Clarke + Pattinson/Siddle will be more effective than just Lyon in most conditions
Highly debatable. Dependent on conditions, of course.
Nah I collected and examined every known instance of the aforementioned bowlers in all different combinations and derived a statistical correlation to derive my conclusionBased on absolute ****
voges and clarke could bowl in an attack that features lyon as well ftr
where does Pat Cummins feature in that correlation?Nah I collected and examined every known instance of the aforementioned bowlers in all different combinations and derived a statistical correlation to derive my conclusion
well you cant blame the selectors for favoring abilities. Otherwise they'd be picking jedibrah and gobI'd be happy for Nathan Lyon can play 250 tests as long as Cummins doesn't get selected again. The favouritism that selectors have shown that kid is an absolute joke.
Maxwell's gona keep as well i supposeWhy don't we just get Glenn Maxwell into the team. Maxwell + Voges together could at least match Lyon, and you could play either 4 specialist quicks or bat your keeper at 8, have 5 bats, Mitch Marsh and Maxwell at 6 and 7.
Boom there's all Australia's selection problems for the next decade solved. No need to waste a spot on a specialist spinner when we obviously don't have any good enough to earn their spot.
Keeper at 8 mateMaxwell's gona keep as well i suppose