• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2014-15

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The final has some interesting background. First, there is the Evra-Suarez saga. Second, it's Buffon and Pirlo's swansong. Third, Berlin is where Italy won the World Cup 9 years ago, so happy hunting ground for the swansingers.

It's gonna be a cracking final :holiday:
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The final has some interesting background. First, there is the Evra-Suarez saga. Second, it's Buffon and Pirlo's swansong. Third, Berlin is where Italy won the World Cup 9 years ago, so happy hunting ground for the swansingers.

It's gonna be a cracking final :holiday:
Chiellini too
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
I don't particularly like Gerrard or Rooney, but I don't get why so many people, particularly English ones, make such an effort to devalue their careers/quality.
Agree. I don't even particularly like players like Rio, Lampard, Terry, Rooney, etc, but for me they were undoubtedly legends. I guess the tribalism comes into it as well as the lack of national team success. I think England's biggest problem has always been a management issue; where they basically picked the worst managers for them the past 1-2 decades. People take the piss out of the 'Golden' generation but all those players were brilliant. Sometimes they were unlucky as well, as a few of their exits were penalties and I also think a lack of decisions (the Lampard goal) ****ed them.

Truth is, I'd have taken him at OT, but not at the replacement of Scholes, because that wouldn't have worked with how we played back then.
I reckon if Gerrard had gone to United...they'd have won much more in Europe and would be regarded as one of the best sides of all time - the same way Barca are talked about - simply because he would have been the perfect player for that team and leader for Ferguson.

See this is it. The slip isn't even something I'd attack him for seeing as it's just bad luck (although tbf the poor control leading to it wasn't). The thing that Gerrard absolutely does deserve criticism for in that game though was an atrocious and selfish second half performance mainly involving wasting more good positions than I cared to count by shooting from 30 yards whenever he had the chance. One of those goes in and he's heroically atoned for the slip, none of them go in and no-one a few weeks later remembers the good positions he wasted. If I had to point to a single game to sum up why I think he is overrated it would be that one, ignoring the slip. The slip was just quite (no actually, hilariously) funny.

With that being said Gerrard off the top of my head has also made more high profile errors than most other names in this discussion. Own goal vs Chelsea in 2005 League Cup final to take it to extra time, backpass vs France 2004, header to Suarez last year, backpass to Henry in some year or other, penalty shootout miss 2006, red card vs us this year and backpass to Drogba 2010. Not a point I'd defend particularly vehemently as I haven't given any of the other names in this discussion much thought, but off the top of my head the list of the others' high profile errors doesn't seem so exhaustive.
Chelsea were wasting time from minute 1...I'm not even joking. They had most their team in the box. A standard play is to shoot from distance to draw them out.

We lost the league because of stupid defenders like Kolo Toure giving up goal after goal in almost every game. But people talk about that season in a way to criticise Gerrard, and often Rodgers. The truth is...we should have never been in that position in the first place. It was a quantum leap of an improvement. The odds were heavily stacked against us in terms of keeping that run going - we had already won 11 in a row at that stage. Something was going to give.

Other than Chelsea in 2005, how many serious attempts were there by other clubs to sign Gerrard?

Granted, most players at top English clubs tend not to leave for other top English clubs so that in itself isn't unusual, but it's telling IMO that while his midfield chums were signed by Barcelona and Real Madrid he was left in Liverpool. And it's because, as good as Gerrard was (and I'm not trying to argue that he wasn't a very good player, just that he's over-rated), he wasn't good enough to play central midfield for a truly elite team. He is too much if a jack of all trades midfielder and to play at the very elite you need to be more specialised than Gerrard was. He didn't have the positional discipline or tackling ability to play DM and IMO lacked the technical ability to be a really elite playmaker.
United wanted him 3 times. Chelsea wanted him twice. Real Madrid wanted him twice. Right before last season Bayern wanted him. Everybody wanted the guy. He was an amazing CM, UEFA club midfielder of the year for what he did in that CL. People talk just about Istanbul...but it was a miracle to even get there in the first place. It was basically Gerrard and a well-drilled defence by Benitez, with a few key goals from Luis Garcia.

Find the Gerrard debate pretty weird. The critics saying he wasn't great because he didn't win the league are silly, but so are the tons of supporters who paint every great performance of his as "single-handed". And with regards to the 2005 final, everyone knows that game was the Dietmar Hamann show... Gerrard can suck a fat one.
I think saying that kind of comment for any player is kind of weird - no one wins single-handedly; but the closest definition to it is Gerrard. You can only appreciate it if you've watched him as much as most Liverpool fans have, to honestly gauge how bad most of his teammates were. I'm sure it got to the point where it got cliche talking about it, but there is a **** tonne of examples. I'm not sure I've ever seen a forward, let alone midfielder score as many important goals - Henry himself said this. I also remember Southgate saying players used to joke about Gerrard crossing the ball in and heading it in himself. It became cartoonish. If there is a video to encapsulate this point; it's this, Gerrard's career in a nutshell:

 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I mean look I wouldn't go as far as Ikki but I agree with an awful lot of that post

Anyway. We argue about Gerrard every 2 months in this thread. We ain't going to change each other's minds, but to try and use titles or the fact he stayed loyal to Liverpool against him is nonsense. Anything else, I'll agree to disagree but those points are a non-starter.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
I mean look I wouldn't go as far as Ikki but I agree with an awful lot of that post

Anyway. We argue about Gerrard every 2 months in this thread. We ain't going to change each other's minds, but to try and use titles or the fact he stayed loyal to Liverpool against him is nonsense. Anything else, I'll agree to disagree but those points are a non-starter.
**** you too then **** :p

I think a lot of the hate is there because other fans know how much we love him and tearing him down is their way to piss us off. But be neutral about it. Gerrard is the kind of footballer every fan wishes they had. I don't mean that in an egotistical way. But think about it. Home-grown lad, incredible, all-time great talent, stays for his love of the club, and helps them win almost everything bar the league...in the most amazing fashion each time, scoring in the finals...etc, he is a comic book hero.

With the world of football as it is, with ****s like Sterling who haven't won jack already looking away; you'd think this kind of player would be more lauded. The added romanticism isn't just that he stayed...lots (well enough of them) of players stay at one club. But he stayed at a club where he knew he was giving up titles and he was courted by the best. If you're Giggs, Maldini, Terry...where the **** are you going? You're winning everything already, making tonnes of money, and playing with the best around. Gerrard knowingly sacrificed more titles to stay loyal.

It's something I will always love him for. I can't put into words what a privilege it has been to watch him all these years in our team and the amount of times he's had to bail out us out is unbelievable. I know some other fans may just think it's an over-exaggeration at this stage, especially after the last 3-4 years have been mixed with his injury and form and what not...but people forget what he was doing earlier. Whether it was last ditch tackle, assist, goal ... he got us over the line again and again. He's been our Atlas, holding the world on his shoulders. If Liverpool ever get back to becoming a proper title-winning team on a consistent basis; then this period is the one that made it happen. If Gerrard had left; I don't know what shape Liverpool would have been in - especially considering the Gillett and Hicks years; where we're getting to CL finals (people sometimes forget we went to 2) despite them killing the club taking it to the brink of administration.

It's like having the fittest bird around, you're out of weight and broke, and no matter how many texts or presents Leo Di Caprio sends she stays loyal. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Yeha I mean we love Danny Holmes, despite his limitations, purely because he grew up on the woody as a white, has Ubi Fides tattooed on him, etc. And we adore Ian Goodison because he gave us a decade, voted best defender in the division a couple of times at the FL awards, etc, no doubt that he is now true SWA through and through. Gerrard is basically a cross between both of them for Liverpool, in a sense, if you get me.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
If there is a video to encapsulate this point; it's this, Gerrard's career in a nutshell:

Ah yes, an ungainly long ball forward, which superficially looked good, but just ended up going out of play and leading to nothing. Sounds about right.
 

cpr

International Coach
Find the Gerrard debate pretty weird. The critics saying he wasn't great because he didn't win the league are silly, but so are the tons of supporters who paint every great performance of his as "single-handed". And with regards to the 2005 final, everyone knows that game was the Dietmar Hamann show... Gerrard can suck a fat one.

This is a good point, every time Gerrard does something right, his fan boys paint him as Pele. It becomes so tiresome that he's put on such a high pedestal by so many Liverpool fans. Compare it to Rooney or Giggs, two undoubtably fantastic players, but both get **** from large sections of the Utd fans at times too - something many Liverpool fans refuse to do when Gerrard deserves it.

Ikki just made a good example of it - I think I made a reasonable point to say although Utd wanted Gerrard, and I'd have taken him to Old Trafford, our midfield system was not designed around the style of player Gerrard is. He'd have had to reign in his style of play to suit one mould (and that'd probably had been the defensive side of his play, because we wouldn't just dump Scholes) and his marauding wouldn't have made Fergie a big fan - He had enough spats with Rooney about wanting to be everywhere, Beckham about not sticking to the right etc, Fergie liked his teams to play to his way.

However Ikki then ignored that and states we'd have been as good as Barca just by adding Gerrard. How can you take that argument seriously. Barca beat us in 2 finals because their attack dominated our defence, they were more than one player better than us.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Ah yes, an ungainly long ball forward, which superficially looked good, but just ended up going out of play and leading to nothing. Sounds about right.
I can see why you'd be smug, after all Arsenal's best players of the past decade have won Premier League titles and Gerrard hasn't. Granted they won them with Man U and Chelsea, but :ph34r:

sorry to all gooners except sledger and furball
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Shearer did it to a far greater extent with Newcastle and I don't think it led to people questioning how good he was, or generally disliking him. Before he took to being a pundit it anyway.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Shearer did it to a far greater extent with Newcastle and I don't think it led to people questioning how good he was, or generally disliking him. Before he took to being a pundit it anyway.
Via Southampton & Blackburn, but. Fair point, kinda, but Shearer was quite heavily disliked throughout his career I found. Certainly got a similar rough ride to Gerrard at many grounds. Especially post-2000 when he'd retired from England.

As for the questioning how good he was - oh I'm sure it would have happened had he played ten years later. Don't forget that there are people (okay, person) who once frequented this thread that felt Thierry Henry was a myth. In the internet age everybody gets denigrated somewhere. I'm sure there are Messi denialists out there on some fora.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Via Southampton & Blackburn, but. Fair point, kinda, but Shearer was quite heavily disliked throughout his career I found. Certainly got a similar rough ride to Gerrard at many grounds. Especially post-2000 when he'd retired from England.

As for the questioning how good he was - oh I'm sure it would have happened had he played ten years later. Don't forget that there are people (okay, person) who once frequented this thread that felt Thierry Henry was a myth. In the internet age everybody gets denigrated somewhere. I'm sure there are Messi denialists out there on some fora.
Shearer would have definitely suffered from football's hipsterization. He played pre-Pep when tight technique and consistent passing was under-appreciated and everyone thought the best players were the ones that banged in loads of goals. Now we've arguably gone too far the other way, in the blogosphere if not the mainstream press.
 

Top