You must be kidding. Finch's technique is bush league stuff. He's can't last with it IMO. Warner has the potential to do much better.**** no. If we're going to ask someone to piss off due to poor performance it's warner.
He got the results though. Plus he did it today when it mattered. I see people pissing and moaning about it but you know what? He toughed it out. He made sure that there's a good partnership that built a base for the last 20 overs. Smith definitely helped a lot, but he was the person at the other end making sure we're at above 5 RPO from 1-30 and that's what you need. He might struggle but when he gets a start he usually makes sure it matters, which I feel is perfectly fine for our team.You must be kidding. Finch's technique is bush league stuff. He's can't last with it IMO. Warner has the potential to do much better.
No way, faulkner is our pressure player.I'm still not convinced Australia are putting out the best team they possibly could. As much as I think he's a spud surely Watson is a better opener than Finch and Warner, and I'm not convinced Faulkner is really necessary when you've got Haddin, Johnson and Starc as your 8-9-10 and Cummins in the wings.
you be kiddingI'm still not convinced Australia are putting out the best team they possibly could. As much as I think he's a spud surely Watson is a better opener than Finch and Warner, and I'm not convinced Faulkner is really necessary when you've got Haddin, Johnson and Starc as your 8-9-10 and Cummins in the wings.
Faulker provides something different pace and change-up wise from Cummins / the rest of the attack, especially on a wicket that is starting to slow up a bit. Like the World T20 when we had Johnson/Nannes/Tait.I'm still not convinced Australia are putting out the best team they possibly could. As much as I think he's a spud surely Watson is a better opener than Finch and Warner, and I'm not convinced Faulkner is really necessary when you've got Haddin, Johnson and Starc as your 8-9-10 and Cummins in the wings.
i'm going for my charge shots over cover
we're not going to struggle to find 20 overs of bowling. henry is a world class talent. it's candy/elliott/kane that could go for big runs.
Bizarre posting. Literally everyone who has seen Henry bowl agrees he's a serious talent.then why wasn't he picked in the original squad
Nah, NZ would have had a much better chance vs. India. We did them 4-0 in NZ 12 months ago, and both sides have improved by about the same level since. Even if they have played more in Australia recently.Think tonight's result is good for NZ. For some reason, had a feeling that India would definitely beat NZ; can't really explain why, but think they're a very good chance of beating us. If we lose, I'll be disappointed but not shattered. Think I would have been shattered for NZ if they had've lost to India.
Nearly all the NZ fans did actually want him in the squad tbf.then why wasn't he picked in the original squad
It's funny that Cory Anderson's bowling has completely flown under the radar in this tournament.apparently no bowling behind southee, boult and dan. henry 5fer incoming.
We've all been asking that one.then why wasn't he picked in the original squad