viriya
International Captain
Still watched it sadly.This will get unwatchable fast if Watson starts winning it for Aus.
Still watched it sadly.This will get unwatchable fast if Watson starts winning it for Aus.
It's still different to just standing in front of all three before the ball has left the bowler's hand. You're at least reacting to where the ball was initially bowled and legitimately trying to play at it.Not always, and are you saying no bowler has ever seamed one back in?
If you're playing a shot you're not just standing in front of the stumps.There's a difference between that and literally just standing in front of your stumps... really not sure what there is to not get here
yeah I'm done with this
jesus christ how was smith "just standing in front of your stumps"? he's moving into a position to play a shot.There's a difference between that and literally just standing in front of your stumps... really not sure what there is to not get here
yeah I'm done with this
Ok seriously stopIt's still different to just standing in front of all three before the ball has left the bowler's hand. You're at least reacting to where the ball was initially bowled and legitimately trying to play at it.
ok last post on the matter for realsies
under your exact logic though the batsman should lose the benefit of the doubt because he's deliberately trying to put his pads between ball and stumps. given that every single batsman not named glenn maxwell ought to do this as a matter of course, this means no one should ever get the benefit of the doubtIt's still different to just standing in front of all three before the ball has left the bowler's hand. You're at least reacting to where the ball was initially bowled and legitimately trying to play at it.
oyou're just weird tbh
feel the burn
I'm not sure how this isn't getting through. He was standing in front of the stumps. Those things that the bowler is trying to hit. You know? In the game of cricket? You must be as blind as you are thick.jesus christ how was smith "just standing in front of your stumps"? he's moving into a position to play a shot.
what you have said over the last few pages is quiet honestly some of the stupidest most non-sensical rubbish i have ever had the misfortune of coming across in my life, please for the good of us all, be done with it.
it's perfectly understandable, the logic just happens to not work at allBut do you guys honestly not get what WellAlbidarned is saying? Obviously it shouldn't make any difference to umpires but his point is also not hard to understand.
I get what he's saying, it's just that what he's saying is stupid.But do you guys honestly not get what WellAlbidarned is saying? Obviously it shouldn't make any difference to umpires but his point is also not hard to understand.
I don't understand what's happeningfeel the burn
just be glad healy didn't make a vaguely racist joke or s/tJust when I think Healy and Taylor can't stoop any low they surprise him. How difficult is it to do some research before you sit down to talk? He can't even name the 'fielder' who dropped the catch.