• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Quarter Final - Australia v Pakistan (20th March)

Who will win this match?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
What more could you ask for? The second most meme team bowling to two meme players.

A dream come true.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
i've literally never heard of this before
OK. You know how when a batsman thrusts his pad out with his bat nowhere near it? Most umpires will tend to give more marginal decisions against the batsman when they do this. Because the batsman is artificially creating doubt with negative tactics rather than trying to hit the ball. Walking across your stumps is similar. You're literally just standing in the way of the thing the bowler is trying to hit. For similar reasons, I understand why umpires would be similarly likely to rule against batsmen frequently employing this tactic.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
OK. You know how when a batsman thrusts his pad out with his bat nowhere near it? Most umpires will tend to give more marginal decisions against the batsman when they do this. Because the batsman is artificially creating doubt with negative tactics rather than trying to hit the ball. Walking across your stumps is similar. You're literally just standing in the way of the thing the bowler is trying to hit. For similar reasons, I understand why umpires would be similarly likely to rule against batsmen frequently employing this tactic.
i mean the main reason umps giving it out when padding up is because (a) it looks truly horrible and (b) you're not trying to hit the ball. it's less negative tactics and more lack of bat in a bat and ball game.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
i mean the main reason umps giving it out when padding up is because (a) it looks truly horrible and (b) you're not trying to hit the ball. it's less negative tactics and more lack of bat in a bat and ball game.
Walking across your stumps isn't anywhere near as bad, but it's still in a similar vein.
 
Last edited:

thierry henry

International Coach
i mean the main reason umps giving it out when padding up is because (a) it looks truly horrible and (b) you're not trying to hit the ball. it's less negative tactics and more lack of bat in a bat and ball game.
Lehmann/Katich/Smith batting looks truly horrible imo.

The immediate thought of the viewer is "if he misses that one on his pads he's plumb in front/bowled around his legs". Hence umpire much more likely to fire you when it eventually happens.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Lehmann/Katich/Smith batting looks truly horrible imo.

The immediate thought of the viewer is "if he misses that one on his pads he's plumb in front/bowled around his legs". Hence umpire much more likely to fire you when it eventually happens.
yeah, but kevin pietersen and abdv. i mean yeah it looks worse but it's not like all batsmen don't look terrible when they get hit in front having gone across their stumps
 

Top