Howsie
International Captain
No mention that they all play for the one province? Disappointing.Love the photos in this:
Andrew McGlashan: New Zealand's class of 2008 | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
No mention that they all play for the one province? Disappointing.Love the photos in this:
Andrew McGlashan: New Zealand's class of 2008 | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
excuses and missing the point. i don't deny a proper west indian side would be powerful or that the windies have the better bowling.1. Stirling (5)
2. Simmons
3. Joyce
4. Samuels (7)
5. O'Brien, N
6. Ramdin +
7. Sammy (6)
8. Holder (3)
9. Taylor (1)
10. Roach (2)
11. Dockrell (4)
If Simmons opening the batting is cheating, then bring Porterfield in. But the West Indies still dominates that comparison; they're still better players. Ireland's just a far better team in terms of actually being a team. WI are **** because they're so bloody fragmented and wracked with conflict; they need a new Worrell to show up. Ireland are good because they've become a genuinely tight-knit unit (fights during intense warm-up games at training notwithstanding) and improved as a team.
If the West Indies can get their best XI on the park and motivated, as well as getting some semblance of functionality into their administration, then they'd wipe the floor with Ireland time and time again.
1. Stirling (5)
2. Simmons
3. Joyce
4. Samuels (7)
5. O'Brien, N
6. Ramdin +
7. Sammy (6)
8. Holder (3)
9. Taylor (1)
10. Roach (2)
11. Dockrell (4)
If Simmons opening the batting is cheating, then bring Porterfield in. But the West Indies still dominates that comparison; they're still better players. Ireland's just a far better team in terms of actually being a team. WI are **** because they're so bloody fragmented and wracked with conflict; they need a new Worrell to show up. Ireland are good because they've become a genuinely tight-knit unit (fights during intense warm-up games at training notwithstanding) and improved as a team.
If the West Indies can get their best XI on the park and motivated, as well as getting some semblance of functionality into their administration, then they'd wipe the floor with Ireland time and time again.
Oh come on. Even if one were to accept the argument that the two sides are equally matched, and that the Ireland v WI game wasn't a case of one team playing well below their potential and getting beaten by a weaker side playing their absolute best (and I obviously don't), you can't seriously think that Ireland would have a 1/5 chance of beating NZ with that bowling attack. NZ will score 350+ against them every time with their medium pacers and no-break bowlers, and Ireland's batting simply isn't good enough to make that many runs - especially not against a bowling attack as good as New Zealand's. It's for this reason that they're not a traditional top-8 standard side, and won't be unless they can get Rankin back and bring a couple of other good bowlers through.excuses and missing the point. i don't deny a proper west indian side would be powerful or that the windies have the better bowling.
people can revise history as much as they like but fact is this west indies side is very limited by their method and not playing very well, and ireland did not fluke that odi win. Windies are still exceptionally talented in the ball striking and bowling departments so quite capable of beating anyone in the world but let's not sit here and pretend dwayne smith is on part with the Irish top four, which was my point all along.
ireland deserved their win, it was not a fluke. that has been my point and i don't care if the west indies all tried to murder each other the night before. good for them.
i'm equally scared of ireland as i am of the west indies side in front of us i.e. one in five chance, because both teams are still good and have some very good players. the proper west indian team being more powerful than ireland is a pointless argument because i've never said otherwise and it's not going to play on saturday or probably for the next 12 months.
anyway i've done enough jinxing of nz so i'll let you all go back to hardcore gambhiring. if we lose on the weekend it's the west indies' playing well and your guys fault for being such sooks, not mine for saying they're equal to ireland. i'm not insulting the windies, i'm praising both sides for being traditional top eight standard.
go the black caps and welcome back west indies. should be a good game.
Who in all probability wouldn't be where he is now if he didn't move to ND at 20 on his own accord. He was overweight and serverly injury prone when he moved up here. He stays down there at Canterbury and he probably isn't bowling anymore. He has a bad rep around here but Grant Bradburn really did save his career.well corey is a cantab so...
Let's just wait until the NZ/Windies quarter... but in the meantime, don't forget that semi is at Eden Park.On unrelated news, I'm worried for NZ vs SA in the semis.. SA start favorites?
I think they have a much better chance of edging their way to a total that they can defend with their bowling attack (or vv if they bowl first). They're a much more well balanced side even in their current state than Ireland are, and their strengths are also much more suited to exploiting NZ's weaknesses.do you really think dwayne smith, johnson charles, samuels with his eye gone, gayle with his eye gone etc etc have great odds to get out of single digits?
stop looking at the names on the team sheet (not something i thought i'd ever accuse you of) and look at them as players right now.
the excuses being made for the west indies do my head in. they didn't play below their potential (they scored 300 ffs) - the team they played just isn't better than ireland.
if we didn't have a big game must win knock out match against them on saturday i'd tell you exactly what i think our bowlers, even our second string, would do to that batting line up most days but i'm not going to because i'm only slightly less of a gambhiring sook than you lot and i'm scared gayle, samuels or one of the hitters is going to give me the tastle to end all tastles.
I used to be a playground supervisor at Corey Anderson's old school. He was almost as strong as I was when he was 11 and I was a 6'7" fully grown man.Anderson looks exactly the same, giving some credence to Kippax's assertions that he's just an early blooming spud.
Lemme guess 6ft7 70kgs-75kgs?I used to be a playground supervisor at Corey Anderson's old school. He was almost as strong as I was when he was 11 and I was a 6'7" fully grown man.
Serious question marks? Forgetting Kane Williamson, Brendon McCullum and Ross Taylor for a second New Zealand have four batsman in Guptill, Elliott, Anderson and Ronchi who all average in the mid 30's. Something that would comfortably make them one of the best bats in the Windies for example. If New Zealand have serious questions over their batting then so do 99 percent of the other teams in this tournament.As much as NZ have impressed with the ball their batting has serious question marks around it imo.The Aus game was a thriller but that was only because NZ allowed it to be with such poor, and nervous batting...if we get 250 they will feel the pressure i think.