trying to piss off Rod Marsh or Darren Lehmann imowhy are we bowling our worst two bowlers in general
Nah mate, all we can hope for is that Chandiguns gets himself some decent time at the crease in prep for the next found. Hopefully he can cement that #6 spot..A New (Little Sri Lankan) Hope?
Did brilliantly off the first of them, need about 50 off the other 3.4 more overs from the not so good bowlers here, really need to capitalize
That does mean four more overs of Maxwell, Watson, Clarke, Smith, Finch (lol) or a combination of the aforementioned though. I don't think they're going to get smashed any less tbh.please, no more doherty
I think it's more likely a combination of both. There's absolutely zero in the wicket for bowlers. Nothing. In Sydney, where there's been a bit of rain recently hasn't there? I know the wicket won't provide the mix of seam and spin it used to, especially in one day. But to offer nothing to the bowlers at all is just boring cricket. It offers free runs to the batsmen up to an arbitrarily high 'par' score. Even with an extra fielder out, the batsman could still swing freely from the hip, whether it be across the line or down the ground.I tend to think it's the fielding restrictions moreso than the pitches that makes games like this so possible. Teams aren't flying along at 7-8rpo for their whole innings; they've maintaining a good run rate while conserving wickets and then absolutely blasting away at the end because death bowling is so hard with only four out.
This wicket is good to bat on but I think with more balanced fielding restrictions it'd be a 300 par wicket rather than a 340 par one.. and I quite like 300 par games.
Clarke to bowl the 42nd plzThat does mean four more overs of Maxwell, Watson, Clarke, Smith, Finch (lol) or a combination of the aforementioned though. I don't think they're going to get smashed any less tbh.