Just rested as far as I understand..chance to give our reserve batsman Tom Latham a hit since a batting injury would leave us looking fairly damn thin.Wait why is corey anderson out?
Nah you're right, pure speculation from the journalist at the practise session based on the batting order in the nets.Has it actually been confirmed? Richardson said on CGW that it was just speculation based on who was training in the nets, which can be misleading.
i think the afghans would be the first to say they'd rather get rolled for 40 fair and square than get an easy rideMy respect for NZ would only go up (not that its low now) if they allow Afghanistan to score 200 and make them feel they deserve to be at the top level.
I did not mean to say NZ should give away easy runs. Lets just say Afghan manage to scrape through to 200.I actually do think that would be the ultimate form of condescension. They're not there to be pitied.
on the other hand, this isn't the kind of thinking that wins you world cups. Give your best all the game time they can get imo.Not sold on the idea of the same XI. I just think it would be very lucky if we went through the whole tournament without any injuries. If Southee rolls his ankle in warm-ups for the quarter-final, you'll have a bowler coming in who has not played competitive cricket for a month.
On the contrary, I am taking into account all possibilities and thinking what is the best way for the team to counter them. It doesn't even have to be an injury. It could be food-poisoning, a fever, or whatever on the morning of a knockout game.on the other hand, this isn't the kind of thinking that wins you world cups. Give your best all the game time they can get imo.
McHesson seem to think that to win a world cup you need to take risks and back your best leaving you with the best honed group of 11 players the country can possibly produce. I understand the logic behind it and it's exactly what we need if we're to beat a strong Aussie or SA side in Australia. Hedging your bets by giving the backups precious gametime is pointless at this stage imo.On the contrary, I am taking into account all possibilities and thinking what is the best way for the team to counter them. It doesn't even have to be an injury. It could be food-poisoning, a fever, or whatever on the morning of a knockout game.
Eh Maybe, but honestly, one game a week isn't a taxing schedule, and I'd rather the players keep busy rather than going into the quarters with no cricket in the last 2 weeks.Not sold on the idea of the same XI. I just think it would be very lucky if we went through the whole tournament without any injuries. If Southee rolls his ankle in warm-ups for the quarter-final, you'll have a bowler coming in who has not played competitive cricket for a month.
Aaaaaand we lost the toss again. They're batting.