So there's still a place for him in our ODI side?Yep, I've been questioning whether it could be one year too many for Mills at the top level, but he's been right on song so far tbf.
So there's still a place for him in our ODI side?Yep, I've been questioning whether it could be one year too many for Mills at the top level, but he's been right on song so far tbf.
They're playing him out.While it seems from the cricinfo commentary that Milne bowled quite well again, his lack of actual wickets is starting to test patience.
Yeah, they did play him very conservatively. I thought he bowled really well actually - and it made me really optimistic for his future. He was quick, but he also bowled cleverly and (mostly) accurately. If he keeps that up, I can't see him struggling against any team. There certainly wasn't much width or poor length to allow a Lachie Ferguson-style blow out.They're playing him out.
I have a feeling he'll struggle against the Saffers and Aussies.
While I suppose that's encouraging, its also not an excuse for failing to take wickets. Good bowlers get wickets even when batsmen are defensive minded. Most of Henry's international wickets so far have come from defensive prods to good balls.They're playing him out.
I have a feeling he'll struggle against the Saffers and Aussies.
He did create chances though - there was at least one drive that caught an edge and went through (non-existent) slips at a catch-able height. And Latham dropped a difficult chance off him (iirc). Plus there was a decent chunk of play-and-misses and mis-timed strokes. If he keeps that up, wickets will start to come sooner rather than later.While I suppose that's encouraging, its also not an excuse for failing to take wickets. Good bowlers get wickets even when batsmen are defensive minded. Most of Henry's international wickets so far have come from defensive prods to good balls.
Yeah, Taylor is as good as anybody at pacing an innings through the middle stages, but his limitations as a death batsman will always see him ranked below the top tier.I don't think he's near the class of those guys tbh.
Don't get me wrong, he's good. But if we're chasing a score of 300+ I'd think Kohli and AB a good shot at bringing it home but I wouldn't imagine Taylor doing the same as often.
Yeah, it's nice to be discussing what bowling combination to field rather than angsting over where our next quality bowler is going to coming from.Such an awesome selection quandary.
I'd agree with that. Ross is a hell of a player but you'd say they're not the AB/Sanga level of match-winning, taken off world-class attack type of knocks.I don't think he's near the class of those guys tbh.
Don't get me wrong, he's good. But if we're chasing a score of 300+ I'd think Kohli and AB a good shot at bringing it home but I wouldn't imagine Taylor doing the same as often.
Bowled well-ish. Started strongly (had figures of 1-1 off 3 iirc), and he got decent bounce and carry while the ball was hard - but when it became softer he became much easier to play. It seems to me that his pace is just too hittable against batsman who want to attack - and that happened as the match went on. Slow enough to give the batsman time, but fast enough that the ball flies off the bat.Did Mills bowl well? Post here imply so but 1-54 isn't all that impressive.
I thought Ross Taylor was very poor with that today he really struggled to rotate the strike with the spinners, there was a period of time where Tom had only faced about 7 of the last 30 balls (and had scored a single off every one).Yeah, Taylor is as good as anybody at pacing an innings through the middle stages, but his limitations as a death batsman will always see him ranked below the top tier.
Hence "behind"I don't think he's near the class of those guys tbh.
Don't get me wrong, he's good. But if we're chasing a score of 300+ I'd think Kohli and AB a good shot at bringing it home but I wouldn't imagine Taylor doing the same as often.