I've always believed no one should cast aspersions on players without proof or at least some reasonable basis....I wouldn't say Nadal is on performance enhancing drugs for that reason but some of these breaks are a little too convenient for me. After his very first slam win about a decade ago, he has missed AO, US twice and Wimbledon but never the French Open! Granted that the hard court season is a bigger part of the season in terms of time but over a career spanning this long it is surprising he's missed all slams but the French-by far his strongest surface. He also seems to return from injury and win everything in sight which is not evidence of anything in itself but compare that to say Murray or whoever and see how much time it takes to come back from injury and how difficult it is to find form, it is shall we say...surprising...too many little red flags there for me. That and all the time wasting between points, the dubious medical time outs not to mention the infamous grunting which the great game could do without and it's easy to see why he's not as universally as some of the others.