This strikes me as harsh. Are his innings' at Melbourne and Sydney considered arse-saving too, or partially match-winning? I can't see how you want to advocate tossing a guy who not only averages 40+ since his return, but also around 100 balls faced per innings. Would you being saying this if he was 26, not 36? And who is the next cab off the rank, someone who will produce better numbers than those (no matter how they look)? None that I'm aware of.The worst possible scenario for the health of Australian cricket. Australia collapses on a docile pitch while Rogers makes an arse saving century. It completely needed to be the other way around if the team is going to go forward. Now we'll have a case of dropping Doolan because it's convenient despite him being the man (and others) that can actually take Australia forward. Just stunting Australia's growth having Rogers in the team only for him to make a century when he should have been dropped the innings before. Though I suppose the only thing that would have been worse was if the SA tale slogged out and Siddle picked up five, masking how poor he's been in this series (and for a while), the same thing with Rogers.
Harris might need a break, I certainly wouldn't be terming it a dropping, but his body is probably starting to feel it after 7 Tests in a reasonably short period of time - not something he's ever had to contend with.