-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** Australia in South Africa 2013/14
- Thread starter TimAngas
- Start date
Hooksey
Banned
Join him in clover, so to speak.
Cabinet96
Hall of Fame Member
Stuart Broad, 38 wickets at 16 for seven matches. Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Hooksey
Banned
Deja vu.
It is plain Johnson is again the single biggest difference between the teams. Ashes revisited.
Last edited:
Adders
Cricketer Of The Year
Huh?? What has that got to do with the post of mine you quoted and replied to? And why do you keep trying to convince me how good MJ has been?? If you have read any of my posts in this thread and "The Beginning" thread you would know that I am as impressed as anyone else......possibly more so.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I wouldn't be surprised if de Villiers goes in sans gloves in PE. In fact I'm expecting him to.
Hooksey
Banned
"Look, the real important question surrounding the second test is not how will the Saffers cope with MJ"
The Poms were in exactly the same boat as the Sth Africans currently find themselves. But you were a bit slow on the uptake regarding Johnson's dominance in the last series. Couldn't accept he was the single biggest difference between the teams when he plainly was. The deja vu here is this series is shaping exactly the same as the Ashes series.
Last edited:
Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
Johnson loves the short stuff when he's batting.
Also has one of the more immaculate covers drives going around.
Hooksey
Banned
I agree. Trying to hit Johnson while he's batting isn't the answer.
Adders
Cricketer Of The Year
Jeez, there goes your inability to spot irony again son........I was talking about the hotties, it was an attempted humorous post which was not meant to be taken literally.
Errrr no, I wasn't slow on the uptake at all. I challenge you to find a single (serious) post of mine where I said anything other than how incredibly good MJ was during the Ashes. My issue was with your repeated churning out of "Single biggest difference between the teams" as I felt that did an incredible disservice to Brad Haddin who was also outstanding and a massive contributor to the Ashes win. The proof in that is that despite 37 wickets @ 14 it was a pretty close call for player of the series.
You really are trying to pick an argument that isn't there mate.
Hooksey
Banned
You are still in denial Johnson was the single biggest difference between the teams in the Ashes series
Spark
Global Moderator
Please, for the love of god, learn to spot when a poster isn't being serious.
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
For all the talk about Johnson being the difference between the two sides, they at least made 200 in each outing. Not much, but at least they werent completely blown away. Had their bowling been up to par, the batsmen would have had a bit more confidence rather than staring at huge totals and it would have been a far more competitive contest. The real disappoint in this test was the fielding, and the bowling of Morkel and Philander.
As a SA supporter, I am not too worried. SA as usual are slow starters, as they were in the UAE and against India. However, against this confident Aussie lineup, the results were far more dramatic than usual. But I am at least confident that SA will perform better in the second test. Steyn is over his injury and stomach bug, Philander rarely has two poor tests in a row, Amla appears to be regaining his groove and De Villiers is in fine form.
SA need to get their bowling selection right and stop being so negative. You cant afford two bits and pieces players in McLaren and Peterson, especially as Johnson will skittle them like tailenders anyways. Peterson has to go, Duminy is enough of a spin option. Have a fourth attacking pace option, ideally Abbott or possibly Parnell. McLaren didn't bowl that poorly. So you can the Aussie lineup under constant pressure.
My big issues with this test is that Australia's batting have been made to look better than it is.
As a SA supporter, I am not too worried. SA as usual are slow starters, as they were in the UAE and against India. However, against this confident Aussie lineup, the results were far more dramatic than usual. But I am at least confident that SA will perform better in the second test. Steyn is over his injury and stomach bug, Philander rarely has two poor tests in a row, Amla appears to be regaining his groove and De Villiers is in fine form.
SA need to get their bowling selection right and stop being so negative. You cant afford two bits and pieces players in McLaren and Peterson, especially as Johnson will skittle them like tailenders anyways. Peterson has to go, Duminy is enough of a spin option. Have a fourth attacking pace option, ideally Abbott or possibly Parnell. McLaren didn't bowl that poorly. So you can the Aussie lineup under constant pressure.
My big issues with this test is that Australia's batting have been made to look better than it is.
Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah Peterson out for de Kock would mean just that.