• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

India, Australia, England attempt to take control of Cricket

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
There are two things nauseating about this intimidation.

1) BCCI is threatening the poorest and weakest lot which is also their geographical neighbour.
2) They are threatening them to sign their own death sentence.

That is just not cool. Call them on it BCB. Come on. Show some balls. And then hire a sniper to take out the entire BCCI board.
 

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
Wow. Going after the weakest of the weak boards.
Incidentally, how many votes for this proposal need to be passed?
The request for a deferral has altered the situation with regards to the number of countries that are backing the Big Three's new plan for world cricket: while most changes in the executive board require a minimum of seven boards to be in agreement, significant constitutional changes - which the proposals are recommending in executive and financial matters - require eight votes.

To get a special resolution passed, eight out of the 10 Full Members will need to back the proposal according to the ICC Constitution. Article 6.12 a)3)b) in the constitution, which deals with voting on a special resolution, reads: "Resolution proposed at Conference or at a Special Meeting shall be deemed to have been carried as a Special Resolution only if not less than three-quarters of the aggregate number of votes exercisable by all the Full Members shall have been cast in favour of the Resolution, irrespective of whether or not all of the Full Members shall have actually been present in person or by proxy."
From CI
 

swede

U19 12th Man
The fact that Zimbabwe and Ireland will be in Intercontinetal cup for good,means the cream of their crop will want to play for England now,also cash.Zimbabwe currently on strike heard rumours Brendon Taylor will end up at Hampshire.
South Africa will be no longer part of the top 3 meaning a big cash drop could see a lot of South Africans move to county cricket,even Graeme Smith who now has his Irish passport.They are also looking at having 2 Black people per team,so expect a lot of Whites to jump ship.
Holland has lost its one day status so if Ryan Detouschate wants to play international cricket,it will have to be for England,and he is qualified.
Expect County cricket to double from 70 foreigners a year,to 140 in the next few seasons,especially with these players being cheap.
What do you expect when you end the test ambitions of Zimbabwe and European counties,and halve the ammount of cricket South Africa will play.
I think thats an extraordinarily negative view. Why assume that england and Australia would use any increased infuence in such a way.
The 6 nations rugby championship is about to start. Here Engand heavily subsidises Ireland, Scotland and Wales. But they do so because they get something back. Great games and great rivalries. What does some of crickets minnows deliver?

Its not even as if this "big 3" is anything new. Currently we have a "big 10" whats the difference, except some of those 10 dont deliver much.
Some of the minnows might cry out for solidarity now but do they themseves want the likes of aghanistan or ireland to advance? I think Ireland would have brought a lot to cricket by now if they had been admitted 10 years ago but the current system makes it impossible. Its not a great system that allows the failures of Zimbabwe or Bangladesh to stop others progressing but thats what happened. .
 

swede

U19 12th Man
Wow. Going after the weakest of the weak boards.
Incidentally, how many votes for this proposal need to be passed?
If they are going after anyone its some of the most privilleged boards in all of cricket. Those who are effectively given large sums of money by others and have a huge infuence compared to a large number of countries below them who get basically nothing despite hardly being that much behind them on or off the field.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yeah, pleasantly surprised by SL. Thought their board would've been bribed
They've shown some balls of late in general, telling several players they weren't allowed to play IPL/BBL for various reasons, and then scheduling a tour of Ireland of all things during the next IPL.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This just ****ing disgusts me.
Daemon fuming at the brave stand taken by Sri Lanka

ESPNcricinfo ‏@ESPNcricinfo 1m
Breaking: ICC Board defers any decision on Big Three draft proposals following heated meeting in Dubai #ICCrevamp
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
The first day of the International Cricket Council's Board meetings concluded in Dubai today with unanimous support for a set of principles relating to the future structure, governance and financial models of the ICC.

The ICC Board unanimously supported the following principles:
There will be an opportunity for all Members to play all formats of cricket on merit, with participation based on meritocracy; no immunity to any country, and no change to membership status.
A Test Cricket Fund paid equally on an annual basis to all Full Members (except the Board of Control for Cricket in India, Cricket Australia and the England and Wales Cricket Board) will be introduced to encourage and support Test match cricket.
A larger percentage from the increasing Associate Members’ surplus will be distributed to the higher performing non-Full Members.
Mutually agreed bi-lateral FTP Agreements which will be legally binding and bankable and will run for the same period as the ICC commercial rights cycle (2015-2023).
Recognition of the need for strong leadership of the ICC, involving leading Members, which will involve BCCI taking a central leadership responsibility.
A need to recognise the varying contribution of Full Members to the value of ICC events through the payment of ‘contribution costs’.
The establishment of an Executive Committee (ExCo) and Financial & Commercial Affairs Committee (F&CA) to provide leadership at an operational level, with five members, including BCCI, CA and ECB representatives. Anybody from within the Board can be elected to Chair the Board and anybody from within ExCo and F&CA can be elected to Chair those Committees. With the ICC undergoing a transitional period that includes a new governance structure and media rights cycle, this leadership will be provided for two years from June 2014 by: a BCCI representative to Chair the ICC Board, a CA representative to Chair the ExCo and an ECB representative to Chair the F&CA.
A new company will be incorporated to tender future commercial rights for ICC events. There will be three major ICC events in each four-year cycle, including the ICC Champions Trophy which will replace the ICC World Test Championship.
ICC will utilise a more efficient operating model for all ICC events, with a simplified accounting model across ICC income and expenditure to help better manage ICC administrative and event costs.

ICC President Alan Isaac said: “This is an important time for world cricket and it is extremely encouraging that the ICC Board has unanimously supported a set of far-reaching principles that will underpin the long-term prosperity of the global game.

“These principles emphasise the primacy of Test cricket and that for the first time in cricket's history participation will be based entirely on meritocracy, giving everyone powerful incentives to play better cricket and develop better cricketers.

“There is more work to be done by the Members in developing their schedules of bilateral cricket while at the ICC we need to work through the detail of the manner in which these principles will be implemented.

“Extensive work will now be undertaken in advance of a follow-up Board meeting next month.”

Mr Isaac also expressed his disappointment with the misconceptions that had been created as a result of a draft position paper produced by three ICC Members being leaked.

“Several months ago I encouraged BCCI, CA and ECB to enter into a constructive dialogue together to help resolve some of the key commercial and governance issues facing the game. These leading cricket nations have worked tirelessly to produce a document which provided the basis for the past few weeks of extremely constructive discussions.

“It is obviously very disappointing that a draft position paper from these Members was leaked as this prompted a debate that ignored the ongoing negotiations between all Members and led to unwarranted criticism of many of those involved in the process.

“The principles agreed today provide clear evidence that through the course of further discussions over the coming weeks we can be increasingly confident in achieving consensus.”

David Richardson, the ICC Chief Executive, added: “An enormous amount of effort has gone into developing a comprehensive set of proposals that include input from all Members.

“The Board has held some very constructive, inclusive, wide-ranging and far-reaching discussions and I am looking forward to bringing to fruition some of the principles that have been proposed and accepted in relation to the cricketing structures of the global game.”


The ICC Board consists of the chairman or president from each of the 10 Full Members plus three elected Associate Member representatives. Also present at ICC Board meetings is the ICC President, who chairs proceedings, the ICC Chief Executive and the ICC Vice-President.



Alan Isaac - ICC President

Mustafa Kamal - ICC Vice-President

David Richardson - ICC Chief Executive



Zaka Ashraf - Pakistan

Dave Cameron - West Indies

Peter Chingoka - Zimbabwe

Giles Clarke - England and Wales

Jayantha Dharmadasa - Sri Lanka

Wally Edwards - Australia

Nazmul Hassan - Bangladesh

Imran Khwaja - Associate Member Representative

Chris Nenzani - South Africa

Keith Oliver - Associate Member Representative

Martin Snedden - New Zealand

Neil Speight - Associate Member Representative

Narayanaswami Srinivasan - India
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As i expected not as bad as initially it looked with the leakings. Test cricket fund looks interesting hopefully the amount is substantial and there should be pre set conditions that you only get the money from the fund if you are playing 8-10 tests a year this should stop the likes of PCB, SLCB and WICB to stop dicking around with test cricket.
 

nightprowler10

Global Moderator
The leak had to be intentional. I think at the end of the day this whole thing really was a negotiation tactic for the three boards to get more power and money, as some members here called it.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
How credible are these news reports?

I am sure the Big 3 used the carrot stick policy with the dissenting boards, but don't imagine them using such blunt language
All kinds, apparently. Test opportunities for Ireland and India having a Test tour against Pakistan is what I'm hearing.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
It's time some other boards stood up and called BCCI's bluff, imo.

And this might be the best time to do it even with Indian general elections nearing. These politicos and crony businessmen have much more riding there.

There's no way that Indian public will settle for not having the Indian team at World Cups. Extended IPL will also have rate of diminishing returns.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
The issue isn't Indian non-participation at the 2015 WC. With just a year to go, that's probably an inked deal and the BCCI would most definitely not be in a position to renege on that. It's BCCI participation in ICC events that haven't had broadcast deals signed yet by the ICC that's at stake here. Once you have a broadcast deal signed that has ironclad guarantees on the participation by the individual boards (presuming the ICC and the broadcast companies aren't stupid enough to not have those in place), you'd be sued by all and sundry if you then back out. The Indian public isn't all that enamoured by the Champions Trophy, and so that makes the 2019 WC the big target.
 
Last edited:

ganeshran

International Debutant
BCCI is not going to pull out of the World Cup.

In the unlikely event that the Big 3 pull out (with WICB, NZC and ZC), they will set up a parallel cricket organization and encourage rebel teams from the dissenting nations to join them by forming their own associations. They will conduct their own world cups with the other nation players being offered IPL/BBL and country contracts to join them.

The most probable outcome though is that the Big 3 will get more revenue (but lesser than the numbers being floated), and the dilution of the FTP. The two tier and relegation clauses were anyway DOA
 
Last edited:

ganeshran

International Debutant
All kinds, apparently. Test opportunities for Ireland and India having a Test tour against Pakistan is what I'm hearing.
BCCI even offered to tour a neutral country for a Pak tour, something that they have always been against.
 

Top