• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in New Zealand 2013/14

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
we field like gods whenever Anderson is bowling. I thought both of those shots would be 4, and I thought that ball was landing safely.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Good catch NcCullum. It's fielding like that which makes NcCullum just passable as a LO all-rounder for NZ
 

Flem274*

123/5
Yep, Bradburn did a great job getting him to this point.
i think the cantabrians might have a bit to say there. pity bradburn's obsession with cute little norounders leaves genuine quality like Carter, Mathieson and Verma out on the cold eh.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
So, after observing WASP I think I've worked it out, it appears that if India score a lot of runs their chance of winning goes up, but if they lose a wicket or score slowly their chance of winning goes down. In real time. Quite a sophisticated piece of kit, really.
 
Last edited:

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
lol at the run rate talk. Almost completely irrelevant when they need less than 200 from here and Kohli is in with Dhoni to come.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
lol at the run rate talk. Almost completely irrelevant when they need less than 200 from here and Kohli is in with Dhoni to come.
Yeah, and when Doull says he thinks 100 of the last 10 is easy for India, Ian Smith acts like Doull is cray cray.
 

Top