OK so you are rich enough to spend money on television, good for you.Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realise it was 1976.
Ummm what is your problem dude, you are the only one here being insulting.God, can this SpofforthLohman bloke please **** off.
Yes, exactly. Take boxing and MMA.... pay tv has made these sports irrelevant, those sports miss out on many millions of viewers due to their own greed. Lets not do that to cricket.TV should be like dairy products: free for everyone
Foxtel is a rip off, apart from a couple of sporting events, you can see everything foxtel has on other free tv stations. I get plenty of rugby league and cricket on free tv... what more could I want ?... as for the tour of India I am VERY glad I didn't have to suffer watching that. When Australia plays that bad i don't want to see it.Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realise it was 1976.
Quite. Paying for something you enjoy that costs millions of dollars to produce obviously goes against everything a capitalist society stands for.
stop trying to jinx us.Congrats Australia.
It perhaps shouldn't be surprising to you though that, given you usually only get to watch home matches, Australia weren't as good when you got a rare opportunity to watch an away series. Australia have put in many worse performances even just in recent times than they did in that series. The recent Indian tour and the last home Ashes are two great examples.Foxtel is a rip off, apart from a couple of sporting events, you can see everything foxtel has on other free tv stations. I get plenty of rugby league and cricket on free tv... what more could I want ?... as for the tour of India I am VERY glad I didn't have to suffer watching that. When Australia plays that bad i don't want to see it.
If you think this England side is winning this from here then you can't have actually been watching much during the 40 years you have claimed to watch cricket.stop trying to jinx us.
Let him get paranoid.If you think this England side is winning this from here then you can't have actually been watching much during the 40 years you have claimed to watch cricket.
No, as soon as the next wicket goes it is all over as we have seen so often this series.Just a further 300 runs needed now. If these two can get to stumps, England do have a decent sort of chance.
5 wickets really. What can Broad really do with that leg?Target below 300 and we still have 6 wickets left. Hmmm it's getting interesting again.