wiff
First Class Debutant
The first test was flattering that OZ got so close.3-0 was flattering in many people's opinion.
The first test was flattering that OZ got so close.3-0 was flattering in many people's opinion.
"All four games were tight and could have gone either way. Three-nil probably flatters us a bit if we are being brutally honest. But at the same time we fought out of holes and that is what you need in a series like this one."noted ignorant outsider james anderson Ashes 2013-14: England were flattered by three-nil win over Australia, admits James Anderson - Telegraph
Partially agree with you here. But the fourth test was blown by Australia and showed that they didn't have the mental capacity to win, so I have no problem with result. The 3rd test oz got three early wickets on the last day, but following batsmen could of dug in and got a draw, we will never know. If the English had got a draw like that, we could have been demoralised and lost 4-0. So maybe the rain was good for Australia. Who knows?But over the last 3 tests in England, Australia performed very well and I'm not sure if you can claim the rain that occurred in the 3rd and 5th tests which wiped out Australia's chances of victory as a big moment England won.
Anderson clearly trying to claim underdog status herenoted ignorant outsider james anderson Ashes 2013-14: England were flattered by three-nil win over Australia, admits James Anderson - Telegraph
Monty Panesar and Jimmy Anderson holding on for a draw anyone?I seriously doubt Old Trafford would have been a draw. That pitch was doing bizarre things.
On a complete road with no assistance for the pacers and a pretty average attack. Old Trafford was an excellent attack on a pitch with turn and bounce for spin and significant variable bounce for the pacers.Monty Panesar and Jimmy Anderson holding on for a draw anyone?
Sorry. My secretary, who normally types my posts as I dictate them, is away today at a funeral so I'm having to type them myself.It's spelt retentive, not retenetive.
You have very conveniently excluded ManchesterHooksey, so do you think Aus deserved to win any of the 3 matches that Eng won?
Just visualised this occurring during your rantsSorry. My secretary, who normally types my posts as I dictate them, is away today at a funeral so I'm having to type them myself.
But if pointing out a typo makes you feel better, by all means do go on. It's better for the forum than arguing over what "the result flattered team X" means.
Actually, good point, pointless discussion.I really don't know why you ****s are talking about this FFS. It's an exercise in anally retenetive semantics. Jog on ffs.
Watch the Shield live stream and go sell crazy some place selse. We're all filled up here.
Hahah Boycott saying "you know what the worst part is, Australia aren't that good a side"