conn is bad but i still put him a bit above craddock and dorries who are absolute shockersLet's just be clear about something: Conn, Craddock, Dorries and well most of the people at those News Ltd tabloids suck
thanks for my ruining my thread idea.rank the ****wits
dorries
craddock
conn
rothfield
you could easily be confused as to whether it's 1-4 or 4-1 tbh. i'd have to box the field
it took a while but i knew i'd get you back for not tallying this http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/testing-forum/58651-2012-13-bigbash-long-range-comp.htmlthanks for my ruining my thread idea.
i didnt mention it there but the plan was to hold another two comps and then tally up the votesit took a while but i knew i'd get you back for not tallying this http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/testing-forum/58651-2012-13-bigbash-long-range-comp.html
That's the back page the show on fox sports, not the newspaper page ftr.I read that Buzz ****s article on the weekend, **** it was bad.
Who's that bald headed bell end they have on the back page? I haven't read anything he's written but holy **** he is one gigantic spud.
Nah he means Peter FitzSimons.​You don't mean Paul Kent (not a euphemism) do you?