So from now on, anything that wasn't the worst thing to happen in a cricket match, we leave alone? Cue the tumbleweeds and blank forums. I'm no Watson fan at all but no professional sportsman should revel in the injury of another, lest they open themselves up to the karma of such a fate themselves. So unnecessaryNeither of those dicks need defending from fanboys. Dhawan couldn't have done it to a nicer guy and he deserves whatever sledging is thrown at him in the future. So everyone stfu. It wasn't the worst thing to happen in a cricket match.
Yeah let's not talk about any incident at all until someone pulls out a stump and shish-kababs another cricketer with it(Would probably be freaking awesome) . "not the worst thing to happen" What sort of bs is thisNeither of those dicks need defending from fanboys. Dhawan couldn't have done it to a nicer guy and he deserves whatever sledging is thrown at him in the future. So everyone stfu. It wasn't the worst thing to happen in a cricket match.
Shame because I "value" your opinion as I know whatever you venture on any topic is complete horse****Will blocking you mean that you don't try and talk to me again? Mate, for all the dinners in the world, I don't care about your opinion. I never have and I never will. Please stop replying to anything I say, don't bring me up ever again. Your opinions do not mean one iota to me.
Stfu precam.Yeah let's not talk about any incident at all until someone pulls out a stump and shish-kababs another cricketer with it(Would probably be freaking awesome) . "not the worst thing to happen" What sort of bs is this
Er, no.Stfu precam.
Ah yes... The first few weeks on an online forum... Getting accused of being a multi by members who disagree with youStfu precam.
So if i post something irrelevant I will be infracted, and people abusing other posters is fine in your view? Don't you think that deserves an infraction? Was daemon's post acceptable?People can discuss whatever they like so long as it's related to the match, and so long as it's a genuine discussion. If they feel strongly about something, they're well within their rights to post about it and it's not trolling to do so within reason. Notice that the people objecting to Dhawan's behaviour are nowhere near universally Australians (or even non-Indians).
On the other hand, the post you made above with the youtube link is not relevant to the discussion and is absolutely trolling, and if you make another like it you'll be infracted.
I just find the irony of this post hilarious since your argument with Daemon was about him finding Dhawan's behaviour unacceptable and you disagreeing .So if i post something irrelevant I will be infracted, and people abusing other posters is fine in your view? Don't you think that deserves an infraction? Was daemon's post acceptable?
Ok fake IDI just find the irony of this post hilarious since your argument with Daemon was about him finding Dhawan's behaviour unacceptable and you disagreeing .
I hardly think calling someone a ****ing knob is the worst thing to happen on a cricket forum. So everyone stfu
could always just leave the mods to do the moderatingSo if i post something irrelevant I will be infracted, and people abusing other posters is fine in your view? Don't you think that deserves an infraction? Was daemon's post acceptable?
We need DRScould always just leave the mods to do the moderating
I fully expected to be infracted when I made the post. I don't think it will go by unnoticed and if I were a mod I'd definitely take action against it. But let's not detract from the reality of the situation here which is basically you feeling hard done by because people are targeting a player of a country that you support.So if i post something irrelevant I will be infracted, and people abusing other posters is fine in your view? Don't you think that deserves an infraction? Was daemon's post acceptable?