smash84
The Tiger King
sobers quite clearly or at least it's not as close as these aussie fan boys make it out to be
![Lol :lol: :lol:](/forum/images/smilies/standard/lol.gif)
sobers quite clearly or at least it's not as close as these aussie fan boys make it out to be
lolBradman was easily twice or 3 times as good a batsman as Imran![]()
I don't get my own tier anymore?i'd like to see the smart arses of the forum like days of grace, pews gimh nufan or flem or whoever try to work out what the worth of a wicket is compared to a run
The only batsmen that we can unequivalently state that Bradman was twice as good as are the other batsmen on his own team.Thats just based on raw stats (which can't really be compared across eras)
Nuhuh
I don't think so. There are a lot of members who do believe that Bradman was twice as good as everyone else and if my memory serves correct Coronis doesn't rate Viv that highly.kyear
I would say that Richards is a lot closer to Bradman as a bat than Chris Martin. And I think Coronis was just winding you up.
Don't know about Bradman, but Kohli twice as good as either of them.More pertinent question is Sir Virat Kohli or Sir Rohit Sharma.
Firstly, the thread is more a comparison between Bradman and Sobers.Bradman is the greatest batsman ever,Sobers the greatest cricketer. Arguably top three batsman, best All Rounder and fifth bowler ever and possibly the greatest fielder to play the game, brilliant slip as well.
If you don't want to compare across eras, fine... I have no issues with that.Firstly, the thread is more a comparison between Bradman and Sobers.
Saying that one is the greatest batsmen and the other is the greatest cricketer is a bit too much tbh.
Greatest of their time? Yes, would agree on that, but no the greatest.