Number 6 is the quandary for the selectors. The other 5 batsmen choose themselves for the 1st test. If someone was running a book on it I'd say Phil Hughes would be favourite. While Mattinson and Faulkner could surpass him if they make big early season runs. I'm hoping they go with Mattinson myself.The more interesting discussion is on who will be the 6th batter, the batting cover and how many all rounders in the squad. Hopefully they don't draft Maxwell into the squad if Watson and Faulkner are in it.
Thanks for the correction mate. Can't promise I won't spell it wrong again though.stop calling him Mattinson
take a guess lad! It's Maddinson btw if you're still wonderingThanks for the correction mate. Can't promise I won't spell it wrong again though.
No argument from me. What I did like about him though is he values his wicket. But he's never really put up the numbers to ensure his continuity in the team long-term.Cowan has shown everyone he simply isn't international standard, he doesn't capitalise anywhere near enough
Never was a big fan, but his form in the last year has been hot. Besides he can break fingers.Mitchell Johnson has been the forgotten man of Australian cricket
Johnson put a case for inclusion in the touring party with his late season form. At his best he is knocking on the door for inclusion. But his best is a rarity. The guy can be more than useful with bat as he's proved on a number of occasions, including the test 100 he made.Never was a big fan, but his form in the last year has been hot. Besides he can break fingers.
Harris will have at best an interrupted preparation - heading in for a scan on the hamstring he injured in the final test.Are Patto and Bird back by Brisbane? If not then Harris, Siddle Starc will play not sure they would bring in as cover though. MJ a chance probably.
meh, that guy could walk out of the hospital and still take a 5forHarris will have at best an interrupted preparation - heading in for a scan on the hamstring he injured in the final test.
It's very obvious to see the similarities between Johnson and Starceh, the big difference is one bowls 140-145k the other bowls 145-150k and that could make a big difference on some Aussie wicketsStarceh is a better, younger version of Johnson who can actually swing the ball, no reason to include Johnson in the team/squad with Starc around IMO
Starc and Bird will be better bowlers in Australia where they will be assisted by steeper bounce, than they were in England. Because he has disappointed and been banished a number of time previously, Johnson is probably in a position where he has to do clearly more than anyone else to even be considered.It's very obvious to see the similarities between Johnson and Starceh, the big difference is one bowls 140-145k the other bowls 145-150k and that could make a big difference on some Aussie wickets