Well, I don't know, it sort of feels like England think they got their team selection wrong. If you feel the match is one that warrants two spin bowlers, then it's a bit worrying that a day later they're using a fourth seamer in the class of Trott. Obviously conditions are temporarily different, but still.Yeah, but that's "don't bowl Trott because you've picked five bowlers", not "don't bowl Trott because you've picked two spinners".
Or at least half his match fee.that's a fine
Yeah but that's because Woakes is also playing. Under "normal" circumstances of picking two spinners then Trott would be more likely to bowl than he would when three seamers were playing as he'd then be the third seamer. It made your post read funny IMO, but I'm just being a dickhead really as Spark pointed out.Well, I don't know, it sort of feels like England think they got their team selection wrong. If you feel the match is one that warrants two spin bowlers, then it's a bit worrying that a day later they're using a fourth seamer in the class of Trott. Obviously conditions are temporarily different, but still.
Definitely in on the CW joke."what a way to go to your debut hundred" - Yesss Nasser
Wild guess: Hussey/Haddin last ashes series. checking nowgotta be the first time in years that we've had two tons in an innings without Clarke being one?
Hussey & Haddin at Brisbane in the last Ashes.gotta be the first time in years that we've had two tons in an innings without Clarke being one?