*Official* Third Test at Old Trafford

[Swingpanzee]

No it isn't. The issue here is bad umpiring.

Do you actually know how the BCCI works. All they need is smoke for calling it fire.

 

[Swingpanzee]

Snicko confirms it's not out.

 

[adub]

tbf it was only a matter of time for Uzi, but FMD.

 

[Cabinet96]

But Beefy, if he didn't hit it he would've reviewed it straight away without hesitation. Come on, think about it FFS.

 

[morgieb]

At least with stuff like the Broad decision umpires can make mistakes.

But you'd expect with technology that mistakes can be overturned? Can't blame UDRS, but if **** like that happens, then what's the point?

 

[dermo]

pews cheering cause Khawaja was 1 off 18 when that happened

 

[Maximas]

But Beefy, if he didn't hit it he would've reviewed it straight away without hesitation. Come on, think about it FFS.

lol, Khawaja was probably scared something like this would happen and he'd lose a review

 

[Burgey]

English fans not happy about time wasting. Lolworthy after Broad at Nottingham.

 

[Spikey]

if there's one we can all agree on, it's that the english over-rate has been disgusting this morning and cook should be banned

 

[stephen]

In other news, Stevie Wonder's selection as third umpire is turning out well for the BCCI.

 

[benchmark00]

How people can sit there and think DRS enhances the cricket watching experience is beyond me.

 

[Spikey]

Snicko confirms it's not out.

the first replay confirmed that

 

[Swingpanzee]

But Beefy, if he didn't hit it he would've reviewed it straight away without hesitation. Come on, think about it FFS.

That's not a great argument tbh. That was **** decision made by a peabrain.

 

[Tangles]

How people can sit there and think DRS enhances the cricket watching experience is beyond me.

Just kills all momentum.

 

[Burgey]

tbf it was only a matter of time for Uzi, but FMD.

Yeah but he looked **** against Swann at Lord's too and kicked on to make 50 odd in the second dig.

Seriously though, does anyone think Dharmasena deserves to live after that?

 

[LongHopCassidy]

You heard the man

Has over 800 retweets already.

 

[adub]

[Have to remember that without DRS it would've been out anyway. DRS hasn't actually changed the match with a bad decision. It's just sad that it hasn't overturned one that should've been. ]

I reckon with no DRS in the ump would have given it not out. It was a stinker of a call in any situation, but when the batsman has two reviews up his sleeve I reckon as the umpire you'd be more likely to give on like that knowing that if you did get it wrong it will be soon fixed (so long as a ****ing ****** isn't 3rd umpire)

 

[John73]

How people can sit there and think DRS enhances the cricket watching experience is beyond me.

I've always been a fan of DRS, but that was disgraceful

 

[sunilreddy]

Good decision...

 

[Spikey]

I just want it confirmed that Dharmasena checked the no-ball cause i cant remember