you forgot aboutwhere's the accountably!!>!?!?>]13\]31k3k4
i wasn't sure whether to count that as a dropping or a behavioural suspension. I suppose it's a bit of both.you forgot about
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
dropped at some stage
That feeling you have is the same feeling England fans felt for most of the 90s and early 2000s.why i am even watching this, it's like waiting for your impending execution
Bres is a pretty limited batsman though. It's one thing belting India's trundlers a couple of years ago, but I just don't think he's equipped to flourish against anything quicker, or decent slow stuff. On a related issue, I don't understand why he's batting ahead of Broad. All that being said, if he can stick around this morning until the cloud cover shifts, that would be a very handy job indeed.Big innings for both these two really. Root obviously needs to get some runs to justify him being an opener.
Yet Bres needs some too, and I think that probably played a part in him coming in as Nightwatchman. Yes he took a couple of wickets but so did Finn to start with at TB. He's partly in for an added stability in the batting. Recently he just seems to score a very slow 7-20 without ever really looking like he's going to push-on. Got all the time in the World to do it now.
Took the words from my mouth. Furball can't keep harping on about average boosting by **** attacks when Watto averaged more in the 2010/11 Ashes than his career average as opener.You mean yours?
Maybe that's the thinking, but I reckon it's a misconception. My view is simply that Broad is a significantly more talented batsman. I'd also like to see Broad encouraged to take his batting seriously, which I think is less likely if he's batting at 9.He's seen as a more 'solid' batsman than Broad (well I say seen as, he is) who you'd back to last more balls than Broad, which I guess is more helpful for the top 7 batsman he comes in to bat with.
Broad always has a touch of the baby giraffe about his batting, like his co-ordination is a bit wonky. Seems to manage though he has patches where he's so awful that it's hard to believe he's got a significant test century.Maybe that's the thinking, but I reckon it's a misconception. My view is simply that Broad is a significantly more talented batsman. I'd also like to see Broad encouraged to take his batting seriously, which I think is less likely if he's batting at 9.
Yeah, unlike Broad and Swann hs actually has the ability to build an innings. He's never actually been dismissed in the 36-89 range ever in test cricket. All his scores above 35 have ever been not out or 90's. Whereas Broad and Swann are much better for a quick 40 or whatever. He's probably not as naturally talented as them with the bat, but he has a somewhat solid technique and can make a decent amount of runs in an innings when he gets set.He's seen as a more 'solid' batsman than Broad (well I say seen as, he is) who you'd back to last more balls than Broad, which I guess is more helpful for the top 7 batsman he comes in to bat with.
Which instantly makes me a him a better batsman than Shane Watson in the eyes of CW's Australian contingent.Yeah, unlike Broad and Swann hs actually has the ability to build an innings. He's never actually been dismissed in the 36-89 range ever in test cricket. All his scores above 35 have ever been not out or 90's. Whereas Broad and Swann are much better for a quick 40 or whatever. He's probably not as naturally talented as them with the bat, but he has a somewhat solid technique and can make a decent amount of runs in an innings when he gets set.
He still got more than other plays who gave it away though. Which is the main point.Hmm, those two 90s were against Bangladesh and India at their absolute worst, weren't they?