• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lord's

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Big innings for both these two really. Root obviously needs to get some runs to justify him being an opener.

Yet Bres needs some too, and I think that probably played a part in him coming in as Nightwatchman. Yes he took a couple of wickets but so did Finn to start with at TB. He's partly in for an added stability in the batting. Recently he just seems to score a very slow 7-20 without ever really looking like he's going to push-on. Got all the time in the World to do it now.
Bres is a pretty limited batsman though. It's one thing belting India's trundlers a couple of years ago, but I just don't think he's equipped to flourish against anything quicker, or decent slow stuff. On a related issue, I don't understand why he's batting ahead of Broad. All that being said, if he can stick around this morning until the cloud cover shifts, that would be a very handy job indeed.
 
Last edited:

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
He's seen as a more 'solid' batsman than Broad (well I say seen as, he is) who you'd back to last more balls than Broad, which I guess is more helpful for the top 7 batsman he comes in to bat with.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
He's seen as a more 'solid' batsman than Broad (well I say seen as, he is) who you'd back to last more balls than Broad, which I guess is more helpful for the top 7 batsman he comes in to bat with.
Maybe that's the thinking, but I reckon it's a misconception. My view is simply that Broad is a significantly more talented batsman. I'd also like to see Broad encouraged to take his batting seriously, which I think is less likely if he's batting at 9.
 

Expressway76

U19 Vice-Captain
Maybe that's the thinking, but I reckon it's a misconception. My view is simply that Broad is a significantly more talented batsman. I'd also like to see Broad encouraged to take his batting seriously, which I think is less likely if he's batting at 9.
Broad always has a touch of the baby giraffe about his batting, like his co-ordination is a bit wonky. Seems to manage though he has patches where he's so awful that it's hard to believe he's got a significant test century.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
He's seen as a more 'solid' batsman than Broad (well I say seen as, he is) who you'd back to last more balls than Broad, which I guess is more helpful for the top 7 batsman he comes in to bat with.
Yeah, unlike Broad and Swann hs actually has the ability to build an innings. He's never actually been dismissed in the 36-89 range ever in test cricket. All his scores above 35 have ever been not out or 90's. Whereas Broad and Swann are much better for a quick 40 or whatever. He's probably not as naturally talented as them with the bat, but he has a somewhat solid technique and can make a decent amount of runs in an innings when he gets set.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, unlike Broad and Swann hs actually has the ability to build an innings. He's never actually been dismissed in the 36-89 range ever in test cricket. All his scores above 35 have ever been not out or 90's. Whereas Broad and Swann are much better for a quick 40 or whatever. He's probably not as naturally talented as them with the bat, but he has a somewhat solid technique and can make a decent amount of runs in an innings when he gets set.
Which instantly makes me a him a better batsman than Shane Watson in the eyes of CW's Australian contingent.
 

Top