Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah but he's clearly been given the Golden Ticket so Watto do what Watto wanna do.I mean, Watson should know from experience to not review that
Yeah but he's clearly been given the Golden Ticket so Watto do what Watto wanna do.I mean, Watson should know from experience to not review that
Yep. truly is a cancer.yeah looked more like he was trying to convince Rogers to agree with him rather than asking for his opinion
Is that Phil Hughes on twitter?Watson's review going down well beyond CW as well
Hahaha, classic Watto. He was always gonna review that. I reckon the mid-pitch went something like this:
Watto: Geez Chris, that wasn't out was it?
Rogers: Nah, sorry mate, that was plumb
Watto: I'm not sure, I'm pretty sure it was gonna miss something.
Rogers: You serious?
Watto: Yeah, I'm gonna check it. I'm glad you agree. *reviews*
Because I'd rather have the stronger bowler. While lower order runs are important its not more important than their bowling. Otherwise you would stack your team with all rounders. Lyon is better than Agar but a dream debut with the bat seems to be clouding peoples judgement on him.Can you explain why?
Watson's review going down well beyond CW as well
Reminds me of "The Office" TV-series, when David Brent interviews a female employee, pressing her to admit he is like a father figure to her.yeah looked more like he was trying to convince Rogers to agree with him rather than asking for his opinion
So wait, you're saying he shouldn't talk to Rogers about it at all and should just walk? That's utterly ********. They should definitely talk about it because Rogers has the best view and Rogers should tell him he's plumb. If Watson still reviews it at that point he's an idiot. If Rogers didn't tell him that, Watson's not to blame IMO. We really have no idea what was said at this point.Oh come on. Hit in front to a straight ball angling slightly in, no nick, the chances you're ****ed are unusually high. Basically forcing Rogers to give him a reason to refer it is **** bloke behaviour too, especially if Rogers did tell him he was out. Unless you've got some seriously strong reasons to doubt the decision, walk.
Rogers would be under pressure though. He knows if he said it's plumb and it actually turned out to be not out, Watson would have a sook and get Rogers dropped..So wait, you're saying he shouldn't talk to Rogers about it at all and should just walk? That's utterly ********. They should definitely talk about it because Rogers has the best view and Rogers should tell him he's plumb. If Watson still reviews it at that point he's an idiot. If Rogers didn't tell him that, Watson's not to blame IMO. We really have no idea what was said at this point.
i think lehmann has basically ensured watson/rogers is our combo for all the testswhat to do with watson, what to do...
If someone offered me 1-40 odd at lunch with Rogers being one of the not out batsmen, I'd take it as the chances of Watto making a match changing score are somewhere between nil and sweet **** allAlso at least Clarke is a great player and you don't mind him wasting one as his wicket is so valuable.