Carn_the_pies
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Yeah don't really rate Finn at all.
Bresnan is the one I would have.
Bresnan is the one I would have.
Course you would!! He's not the same bowler you saw in Melbourne PieMan.....and his record at Lords is crap.Yeah don't really rate Finn at all.
Bresnan is the one I would have.
Yeah but Anderson wasn't taking his wickets at under 30 when he was crap and dropped. Whatever anyones opinion on Finn his results for a young bloke learning his trade are still very good, I'm still torn on whether he should play at Lords or not but there is no doubt in my mind that he is still the future leader of our attack.yeah but wasn't Anderson dropped when he was a liability? or was he given the same faith as Finn?
Anyway I think Anderson had showen far more potential than Finn has. There's a lot more to fast bowling than just being fast and tall.
May well be right. If Cowan plays and grinds out a 50, makes it harder to effect changes for the third test.So bad.
Short turnaround with no matches in between is backing an unchanged XI, for mine. Thought Starc bowled well enough in patches to keep Harris and Bird out for now unless in the interests of rotation.
Anderson was rarely a liability when he was actually given a run in the side. His terrible early record is largely a product of being called up cold into the middle of a series and having a terrible game. His heroics at Mumbai in 2006 are just about the only occasion where he played well having been tbrust into the side.yeah but wasn't Anderson dropped when he was a liability? or was he given the same faith as Finn?
Anyway I think Anderson had showen far more potential than Finn has. There's a lot more to fast bowling than just being fast and tall.
still no idea who you guys are talking about.watson
rogers
hughes
clarke
smith
haddin
agar
siddle
harris
pattinson
starc
obv