The extra over actually ended up helping the English as they'll get a crack at Pattinson first over after lunch.LOL @ Broad's wasting of time. Teams do it all the time so no issues with the actual using of the tactic. The issue is the fact they felt the need to use it. Piss ****ing weak. Man up and get the wicket.
No.Would the result of the match impact on your XI for the next Test? Both teams.
i mean, didn't he actually bowl 30 seconds before the clock even ticked over to half past?LOL @ Broad's wasting of time. Teams do it all the time so no issues with the actual using of the tactic. The issue is the fact they felt the need to use it. Piss ****ing weak. Man up and get the wicket.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62439.htmli've been ridiculously superstitious and haven't left this thread, is this the first occurance of two 50 run 10th wicket partnerships by one team in a single match in test cricket?
The result no, but performances yes. Finn and Bairstows out Onions/Bresnan and Compton in........Root back to 6.Would the result of the match impact on your XI for the next Test? Both teams.
So, probably unsurprisingly my follow up question is would you make any changes?
Well obviously. But 5 days of little/no sleep on top of the already fraught nerves doesn't make it easier.I don't imagine there'll be many going to sleep.
Onions in for Finn. Give Bairstow one more game.So, probably unsurprisingly my follow up question is would you make any changes?
Change Broad's shoes.Whatever happens we have to drop Finn. Other than that I don't see that we should make any other changes at this point.
Pretty much this, except I'd be considering Tremlett.The result no, but performances yes. Finn and Bairstows out Onions/Bresnan and Compton in........Root back to 6.
we're getting the greig thing you guys got the other dayThey're seriously showing this Trott thing? Wtf.
And uvelocity's signature.Change Broad's shoes.
Yes decent pointChange Broad's shoes.