He's an nzer. Big fish, small pond so naturally attracts more attention.I honestly don't get the Williamson love. I think he'll be a good bat and all but I don't think he's anywhere near as good as Pujara, Kohli, Bravo, Warner etc
Indeed, he has no hope of matching up to CD success stories such as Sinclair and How.He's from Northern Districts. Doomed to fail.
Williamson isn't as good as most make him out to be tbh. Decent cricketer but I doubt he'll be near the top of this list a decade down the road.
Shudup, Williamson is New Zealand's next great bowler. Hey I found a gif of Williamson delivering to Munrowhen you have guys like munro turning up to play for you in tests you're going to big up any decent prospect you have tbf.
On his first tour here I thought he had one of the best techniques in the Pakistan side and would be good player.What do people make of Asad Shafiq. Played a good knock against the best in the world on their own home turf.
Cribb likes Williamson; doomed to fail probably makes more sense.He's an nzer. Big fish, small pond so naturally attracts more attention.
Indeed, he has no hope of matching up to CD success stories such as Sinclair and How.
That would be because he is.Williamson looks a much better player than his pathetic average of 30 suggests.
This.Williamson's problem is he's a flawed young middle order batsman playing as a de facto opener.
Munro is a cricketing God! Certainly the best young batsman around right now (top class bowler as well).when you have guys like munro turning up to play for you in tests blah blah blah
Im very much on the same page as you - every time I've watched him bat hes looked very organized and his technique is unparalleled in the NZ side. I rate him very highly, and even though his average is perhaps unflattering hes played some very valuable knocks and considering that he is not yet 23 he has got plenty of time to set that record straight.That would be because he is.
He's underperformed somewhat in his test career to date I'll admit that, inconsistancy has plagued him pretty badly. But some of the expectations people seem to have placed on him are just totally ridiculously, it's as though he should be averaging 45+ and because he isn't he's some sort of cricketing bust. Newsflash, test cricket is tough. It is especially tough when you're a young batsmen trying to make it in a team that is as bad as this New Zealand one as been over the past three or so years. He's also come into the New Zealand team where we've played a lot of test cricket recently (for us anyway) but very little of it at home, 21 test matches and he's played 1/3 them at home.
He might not have the record so far that a few other young batsmen have managed but his overall game is right up there, you only have to watch him for five minutes to see that.
I think what people forget with Lara is that he never had a great technique, his was really a triumph of hand- eye coordination and balance over technique and its one of the reasons why Glenn McGrath worked him over time and time again. An extraneously high backlift along with feet that often got nowhere near the pitch of the ball meant that he was often susceptible to the ball going away from him. My own personal opinion with Bravo is that I just dont think he has the ability of Brian Lara to make up for the deficiencies in his technique though obviously considering that he is only 24 he could very well figure it out over the course of his career.The likeness with Brian Lara is only too apparent for Darren Bravo and quite a player to live upto, though the way he's started his Test career those comparisons won't go away soon. Did struggle in English conditions and like Williamson has done, another stint in county cricket should certainly help his game develop.