CW Draft League

[Himannv]

Awesome. Could do with a decent draft.

 

[Coronis]

Hope its a fun one to watch

 

[Red]

Doing it now!

 

[Jager]

Season four standings
1. Blakus - 10
2. Eds - 6
3. Andy - 4
4. Monk - 3
5. Watson - 1 1/2
5. Kingkallis 1 1/2

Honour roll
Season one (classic draft): Eds
Season two (voodoo draft): Cevno/Marcuss
Season three (clause draft): Blakus & Himannv
Seaon four (classic draft): Blakus

Championship standings
Eds: 24 ½
Blakus: 19 ½
Himannv: 9 ½
kingkallis: 10 ½
Jager: 8 ½
kyear2: 7
AndyZaltzHair: 6
Cevno: 5
Marcuss: 5
watson: 5 ½
Monk: 3
Michaelf7777777: ½

 

[Jager]

Classic draft again, anyone?

 

[watson]

Ok.......

 

[Jager]

Players
AndyZaltzHair
Blakus
Eds
Himannv
Howe_zat
Jager
kingkallis
kyear2
Monk
Marcuss
watson

What format is everyone keen on? Hopefully we can decide on something tonight. Will be based on Test matches, whatever it is.

 

[Howe_zat]

Not really interested in a 'classic' draft. I thought the 'clause draft' idea from before has some legs in it.

 

[watson]

Monk coordinated a Draft recently where each team had at least one rep from each of the major Test playing nations. I think that it worked quite well, and would be easy to organise.

 

[Jager]

Keen for another clause draft, myself. Start sending your clauses in, make sure there's a decent amount of players that fall under the parameters.

 

[watson]

Clause: Must be involved in a 9th wicket (Test match) partnership of 100 runs or more.

 

[Eds]

I should be joint first with Blakus, if Zaremba's vote is included?

 

[kyear2]

Do you want the clauses here or pm. Also how about making the person use the clause they propose in the first round?
Just a thought.

 

[Jager]

I should be joint first with Blakus, if Zaremba's vote is included?

What do you mean?

Also @kyear just post them here, you're free to use them whenever as well.

 

[Howe_zat]

My clause is "Players with a fredfertang feature about them"

 

[kyear2]

Lord's Honour Boards

 

[watson]

My clause is "Players with a fredfertang feature about them"

This might need defining a bit more. For example, this months article is about the 1958/59 England touring team and mentions several players (eg Peter May). Is it OK to use one of those several players even though the article isn't specifically about them as such?

 

[Blakus]

Pick someone who played test cricket for a country they weren't born in. Eg, born in France played for England

 

[Howe_zat]

This might need defining a bit more. For example, this months article is about the 1958/59 England touring team and mentions several players (eg Peter May). Is it OK to use one of those several players even though the article isn't specifically about them as such?

It would have to be a biography piece.

 

[Red]

Pick someone who played test cricket for a country they weren't born in. Eg, born in France played for England

So, basically most of the better English players of the last 30 years?