wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Wasn't really any clear evidence either way, it barely registered with Hotspot. Would've gone with the batsman imoWHY THE **** DID THEY NOT REFER THAT?
z
Wasn't really any clear evidence either way, it barely registered with Hotspot. Would've gone with the batsman imoWHY THE **** DID THEY NOT REFER THAT?
z
You reckon there was enough evidence to overturn that decision? I'm not sure tbh. Quite possible the benefit of the doubt would have stayed with the batsman given how weak the hotspot signal was.WHY THE **** DID THEY NOT REFER THAT?
z
Perfect MO for English conditions IMOWhat's his typical MO? Strikes me as having a hint of Kasprowicz.
Wasn't really any clear evidence either way, it barely registered with Hotspot. Would've gone with the batsman imo
Well, we'll never know will we?You reckon there was enough evidence to overturn that decision? I'm not sure tbh. Quite possible the benefit of the doubt would have stayed with the batsman given how weak the hotspot signal was.
noJust thought you'd throw that one out there, eh?
Well, I think you'd have to have some massive cojones to refer that given it was obvious it hit the thigh guard. There wasn't even the slightest interest shown in reviewing it, so it would have been opportunistic to say the least and, therefore, not a good review (even if the review would have been upheld).Well, we'll never know will we?
Good tastin'Good pace, no movement, angling across the right-hander. Johnson is Dilshan's dream bowler.
....cricinfoSurely we're going to get the McGrath/Pidgeon/Bird jokes coming soon.