theegyptian
International Vice-Captain
not a particularly good innings by compton on a flat wicket but least he used up 135 balls.
They won't go for the win anyway though.have said it before England should look for runs. With 175 runs+ they are in with a chance to even win the game.
A bit like us against SA in the 3rd test, better to fall short going for it than play out a draw.Agree with PEWS. The way I see it, India could get England out at lunch tmr with a lead of around 220 or so. They may target that with 2 sessions and just absolutely collapse going for the win.
"Caught" takes precedence over LBW... there was a similar one in the Aus-SA series.Do umpires signal the manner of the dismissal in such cases? How do scorers know if it was given out lbw or caught?
How can it take precedence ? Either you are caught or you are LBW ?"Caught" takes precedence over LBW... there was a similar one in the Aus-SA series.
Hey, losing only 2-1 looks better than losing 3-1Dhoni should be exiled from India if the team doesn't go for the target all guns blazing if that's the case.
I reckon he'll do the obvious but considering his past record, there's a 10% chance the stupid **** will try to settle for eking out the draw
In this case though lbw and caught are mutually exclusive. Precedence only comes into it if it's pad first and lbw and then bat and caught."Caught" takes precedence over LBW... there was a similar one in the Aus-SA series.
Yeah, that's a possibility.Agree with PEWS. The way I see it, India could get England out at lunch tmr with a lead of around 220 or so. They may target that with 2 sessions and just absolutely collapse going for the win.
Well, you can if it's pad then bat.How can it take precedence ? Either you are caught or you are LBW ?
Can't be both.
Think the umpire communicates it too the third umpire/Math referee later on.