It seems weird to me that if Taylor's relationship with his team-mates was so bad, how come we won two away tests in the past 12 months? And how come the bowling unit has generally performed really well while the batting has been woeful?
The captain can do sweet f.a about how the other batsmen bat other than suggest a strategy for coping with the wicket / opposition bowlers beforehand (which presumably would be in line with the coach's view) or read a riot act if he thinks the others aren't applying themselves (ditto).
But out on the field for long periods at a time, it would seem the ability to judge the bowling changes to maximum effect and talk with bowlers how to bowl to certain batsmen, whether to defend or attack etc.... these are all very much part and parcel of a captain's role. So it doesn't sit right with me that his relationship with the other players was that bad when the batting has been awful for a long time (the coach and selectors' job to fix, no?) while the bowlers have generally performed excellently under Taylor.
The captain can do sweet f.a about how the other batsmen bat other than suggest a strategy for coping with the wicket / opposition bowlers beforehand (which presumably would be in line with the coach's view) or read a riot act if he thinks the others aren't applying themselves (ditto).
But out on the field for long periods at a time, it would seem the ability to judge the bowling changes to maximum effect and talk with bowlers how to bowl to certain batsmen, whether to defend or attack etc.... these are all very much part and parcel of a captain's role. So it doesn't sit right with me that his relationship with the other players was that bad when the batting has been awful for a long time (the coach and selectors' job to fix, no?) while the bowlers have generally performed excellently under Taylor.