Don't quite understand what you mean, but regardless I was referring to some of those tweets from journalists and experts showcased on cricinfo, not so much on this topic.Congratulations on making the second post in this thread talking about square turners.
haha......had come in to check this...you don't forget easily do you ****
Taste it smali.
Oh it'll be anything but comfortable, I can't help but think that Laxman should have waited until the end of the England series to retire, he was made for a situation like yesterday and could have bailed us out, with a garaunteed century at Eden GardensI think we'll win the series, perhaps even comfortably. But the rot has set in firmly and a series win after this will be small consolation.
Yeah I agree, I think everyone is overrating the amount of "help" the pitches are providing. You gotta love the logic at times, when a bowler takes wickets on a "friendly" track and a batsmen makes runs, usually the batsmen gets MOTM because he "stood out" and all that. But when a bowler takes wickets on a flat wicket, a batsmen has invariably scored a double or even triple hundred, and he takes the award anyways.Well played England! Congrats.
Surely Monty should have been the MoM? In both matches, the batsman has been preferred over the bowler for the award.Injustice.
haha....indeed.....india should be avoiding any sort of tracks that have anything for the bowlers in themTime for some flat decks! LOL
so awtaYeah I agree, I think everyone is overrating the amount of "help" the pitches are providing. You gotta love the logic at times, when a bowler takes wickets on a "friendly" track and a batsmen makes runs, usually the batsmen gets MOTM because he "stood out" and all that. But when a bowler takes wickets on a flat wicket, a batsmen has invariably scored a double or even triple hundred, and he takes the award anyways.
Though I agree with you that the pitch being a devil is vastly overrated, it would be nonsense to say this was a flat wicket.Yeah I agree, I think everyone is overrating the amount of "help" the pitches are providing. You gotta love the logic at times, when a bowler takes wickets on a "friendly" track and a batsmen makes runs, usually the batsmen gets MOTM because he "stood out" and all that. But when a bowler takes wickets on a flat wicket, a batsmen has invariably scored a double or even triple hundred, and he takes the award anyways.