• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England should've played Panesar ahead of the extra seamer/patel. No doubt about it. Anyone saying otherwise after looking at this match is kidding themselves.
 

hazsa19

International Regular
hmm i'm always surprised that umpires give batsmen the benefit padding up. Cba to hit the ball, looks very close, give it ffs
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England should've played Panesar ahead of the extra seamer/patel. No doubt about it. Anyone saying otherwise after looking at this match is kidding themselves.
I don't think anyone is denying that now that we've watched the first day, people were just defending the selectors for going with the extra seamer because it seemed like the way to go before the match started.
 

Top