chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
They do have a point.
Lets say we are batting last. We could rest Starc for Smith and extend the batting.
If we bowl last we could rest Warner, Clarke, Watson for Cummins, Mosies and Copeland and have 7 bowlers.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** Australian Domestic Thread 2012/13
- Thread starter vic_orthdox
- Start date
Lets say we are batting last. We could rest Starc for Smith and extend the batting.
If we bowl last we could rest Warner, Clarke, Watson for Cummins, Mosies and Copeland and have 7 bowlers.
NUFAN
Y no Afghanistan flag
Haha its a complete farce though. Its reasonable I guess if it was just one player being replaced by the 12th man, but this is a joke.
QLD to lose within 3 days anyway so probably a moot point.
Mister Wright
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I dont' think that's the issue tbh. NSW should have to name the day 4 replacements before the toss not at close of play Day 3.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nev lyf.
Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
SA going into the Shield match in Tas without Bellerive specialist George at all and making Richardson 12th in favour of the new guy is interesting to say the least. George will be crying in the stands at how good the conditions are too. It's like the selectors figure if they sabotage the team enough, they can lose their way to the alternate dimension where they actually win.
Maybe just crazy enough to work.
EDIT: Just did the math for how much George loves Bellerive;
Career
131 wickets at 31
Bellerive
30 wickets at 18
That's almost a quarter of his entire FC wicket haul at one ground and his average there is only that high because he got smashed wicketless in the last spell he bowled there.
Maybe just crazy enough to work.
EDIT: Just did the math for how much George loves Bellerive;
Career
131 wickets at 31
Bellerive
30 wickets at 18
That's almost a quarter of his entire FC wicket haul at one ground and his average there is only that high because he got smashed wicketless in the last spell he bowled there.
Last edited: