• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** South Africa in England 2012

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is hardly choking. Finn and Anderson have just been really, really good. And of course Kallis shouldn't be back in the pavilion either.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
it's not really choking if you get a couple of questionable umpiring calls and a great a couple of great deliveries...it's just a typical SA loss.
Yeah this ain't choking. Amla aside, they've been pretty unlucky with the dimissals (though Petersen was lolstupid and probably wouldn't have been overturned. Actually definitely not overturned since the knowledge of the appropriate law is questionable in this case)
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Meh, ball hitting glove that is not holding bat should be out anyway. STopid rule - adds nothing to the game apart from making it more complicated. Rod Tucker just very progressive with his decision making ;)
Well that's a strange opinion. Should it be out if we catch you after hitting your helmet?
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah this ain't choking. Amla aside, they've been pretty unlucky with the dimissals (though Petersen was lolstupid and probably wouldn't have been overturned. Actually definitely not overturned since the knowledge of the appropriate law is questionable in this case)
You know, if Peterson had reviewed it, the umpire would've probably paid more attention to that law and thus given Kallis not out as well.

Peterson is to blame for both wickets imo.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah this ain't choking. Amla aside, they've been pretty unlucky with the dimissals (though Petersen was lolstupid and probably wouldn't have been overturned. Actually definitely not overturned since the knowledge of the appropriate law is questionable in this case)
Smith unlucky, how he middled it?

Oh and Vic we lost that match, just goes to show KP wasn't that good anyway.....
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is hardly choking. Finn and Anderson have just been really, really good. And of course Kallis shouldn't be back in the pavilion either.
I don't think Finn has been that good tbh. Bowles a peach to get Amla but I don't think he's bowled much better than Broad for the most part tbh, and he's been merde.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Smith unlucky, how he middled it?

Oh and Vic we lost that match, just goes to show KP wasn't that good anyway.....
It is a tad unlucky tbf, you normally expect bottom edges like that to go straight to ground. Definitely out, but it's an unusual dismissal.
 

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
You know, if Peterson had reviewed it, the umpire would've probably paid more attention to that law and thus given Kallis not out as well.

Peterson is to blame for both wickets imo.
Yes but Tucker clearly didn't miss the hesitancy shown by Petersen and should have been more aware if the situation rises again
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It is a tad unlucky tbf, you normally expect bottom edges like that to go straight to ground. Definitely out, but it's an unusual dismissal.
Well, there's about the constant play and misses he had, Jimmeh deserved to get him in every way.
 

KungFu_Kallis

State Captain
That "decision" is just utterly ****ing dire. Do umpires actually know the laws of the game? Or are they not that relevant anymore
 
Last edited:

Top