• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** South Africa in England 2012

uvelocity

International Coach
contrast with the first test when saffers were flat day one and came out firing day two, minus their keeper. well in front now. poms have been average.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
About 150 more than it should be.

They're were a few dodgy what the **** overs but on the whole they bowled well, yesterday evening and this morning they were excellent, much more like the England we know, tired a bit this afternoon but that's understandable .
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Much higher quality of cricket today. Looks like the whole game hinged on Cook's dropped catch.
Yeah, indeed. I still can't believe that innings was worth 180 odd. We've all seen some ordinary big hundreds that aren't rated very highly because the pitch the flat, the bowling was poor or the game/series situation was unimportant but none of those things are remotely true here. The pitch is a bit slow but there's been plenty of movement around, England haven't bowled at their best the whole time but it's still a very high quality attack and they did definitely show that in periods, and the stakes couldn't have been much higher. He just looked like he was going to get out any minute throughout the whole innings but then just never did. I struggle to recall anything quite like it.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
Yeah, indeed. I still can't believe that innings was worth 180 odd. We've all seen some ordinary big hundreds that aren't rated very highly because the pitch the flat, the bowling was poor or the game/series situation was unimportant but none of those things are remotely true here. The pitch is a bit slow but there's been plenty of movement around, England haven't bowled at their best the whole time but it's still a very high quality attack and they did definitely show that in periods, and the stakes couldn't have been much higher. He just looked like he was going to get out any minute throughout the whole innings but then just never did. I struggle to recall anything quite like it.
Got to admit it was a pretty strange innings, went from one minute looking secure to constant play & misses, never looked truly in.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, indeed. I still can't believe that innings was worth 180 odd. We've all seen some ordinary big hundreds that aren't rated very highly because the pitch the flat, the bowling was poor or the game/series situation was unimportant but none of those things are remotely true here. The pitch is a bit slow but there's been plenty of movement around, England haven't bowled at their best the whole time but it's still a very high quality attack and they did definitely show that in periods, and the stakes couldn't have been much higher. He just looked like he was going to get out any minute throughout the whole innings but then just never did. I struggle to recall anything quite like it.
It's nice to see a SA batsman sorta somehow make 150, instead of the batting line-up sorta somehow losing SA the match and levelling the series
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Thought it was going to the worst double in history, one of the most anoying innings I can remember since that bloody Matthew Elliot 199.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Yeah, indeed. I still can't believe that innings was worth 180 odd. We've all seen some ordinary big hundreds that aren't rated very highly because the pitch the flat, the bowling was poor or the game/series situation was unimportant but none of those things are remotely true here. The pitch is a bit slow but there's been plenty of movement around, England haven't bowled at their best the whole time but it's still a very high quality attack and they did definitely show that in periods, and the stakes couldn't have been much higher. He just looked like he was going to get out any minute throughout the whole innings but then just never did. I struggle to recall anything quite like it.
you just hate the Virus yes he played and missed a lot but there was generally a lot of quality stroke play.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
First thing first is see off the new ball, DON'T need an early wicket.

Oh good first ball, played it well in the end.
 
Last edited:

Stumpcam

U19 Captain
you just hate the Virus yes he played and missed a lot but there was generally a lot of quality stroke play.
What? Any single one of those 30 or 40 or more play and misses could have caused his downfall. He was given a huge let-off when he had less than 30 too, so all the luck resided with Petersen almost throughout his innings.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
So Finn played, went for 100+ at close to 4 runs an over. Onions for Lord's?
Not so different from Bresnan who is supposed to be able to control the scoring rate. And carried rather more threat than Timmy as well. I could make a case for Anderson, Finn & Onions at Lord's.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
Not so different from Bresnan who is supposed to be able to control the scoring rate. And carried rather more threat than Timmy as well. I could make a case for Anderson, Finn & Onions at Lord's.
Could do but would leave a rat like tail.
 

Top