• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

A.F.L. Thread II

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
ick Bowen:
Wilson: there is no base sanction for the offence.Appealing to tribunal jury members as past players who would understand the on-field pressures players are under

Nick Bowen:
Wilson: appropriate base penalty 2-3 games, take into account 30% loading BUT also fact Judd did not have info about particulars of AFL charge until 4pm today

 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah absolute joke. There's no other way he could have contested the ball, just wait until he hit the ground then try and tackle... and by that stage the ball would have been disposed of.

Such a bad decision.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Judd should've admitted it was a chicken wing but claimed that it was a sarcastic tackle and has been taken out of context.
 

Top